Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Channamma W/O. Late Umapathi ... vs Shivayya Gadadar
2025 Latest Caselaw 9389 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9389 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 October, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Channamma W/O. Late Umapathi ... vs Shivayya Gadadar on 25 October, 2025

Author: S G Pandit
Bench: S G Pandit
                                                     -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB
                                                           CCC No. 100273 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
                           DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
                                             PRESENT
                                THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
                                               AND
                                THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
                             CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.100273 OF 2025
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   SMT. CHANNAMMA
                           W/O. LATE UMAPATHI MYGERI ALIAS GURIKAR,
                           AGE. 76 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,
                           R/O. HIREMEGERI VILLAGE,
                           TQ. YELBURGAK, DIST. KOPPAL.
                           NOW AT 15TH WARD, SARADARGALLI, KOPPAL-583231.

                      2.   SHANKARPPA S/O. DODDABASAPPA MYGERI ALIAS GURIKAR
                           AGE. 71 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED SERVANT,
                           R/O. HIREMEGERI VILLAGE,
                           TQ. YELBURGAK, DIST. KOPPAL.
                           NOW AT GAVISIDDESHWAR NAGAR, 3RD CROSS,
                           NEAR ITI COLLEGE, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-583231.

                      3.   SMT. CHANNAMMA
                           W/O. LATE SHAMBULINGAPPA MYGERI @ GURIKAR,
                           AGE. 66 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE,
                           R/O. HIREMEGERI VILLAGE,
          Digitally
          signed by
          VISHAL
          NINGAPPA
                           TQ. YELBURGAK, DIST. KOPPAL,
                           NOW AT 15TH WARD, SARADARGALLI, KOPPAL-583231.
VISHAL   PATTIHAL
NINGAPPA Location:
PATTIHAL HIGH
          COURT OF
          KARNATAKA
          DHARWAD


                                                               ...COMPLAINANTS
          BENCH




                      (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR B. HALLI, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
                      1.   SHIVAYYA GADADAR
                           CONTRACTOR-PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT,
                           POST. KADIVAL, MALAGATTI,
                           TQ. KUSHTAGI, DIST. KOPPAL-583277.
                                                                     ...ACCUSED
                      2.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                                                        ...PROFORMA RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. ABHISHEK L. KALLED, ADVOCATE FOR A1;
                      SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR PROFORMA RESPONDENT)
                                 -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB
                                         CCC No. 100273 of 2025


HC-KAR



     THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1 REGARDING THE NON-
COMPLACENCE OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 12-12-2024 PASSED
BY THE HON'LE COURT IN WRIT PETITION NO.107537/2024 (GM-RES)
DATED 12-12-2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE.

     THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS
MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT
           AND
           THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B.
                          ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT)

This contempt petition is filed under Sections 11 and 12

of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of

the Constitution of India complaining disobedience of interim

order dated 12.12.2024 passed in WP No.107537/2024. The

said interim order reads as under:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Addl. Government Advocate is directed to take notice for respondents No.1 to 3 and 6. Issue emergent notice to respondents No.4, 5 and 7 to 9.

No construction or demolition activity shall be carried out in the property of the petitioner bearing No.139, situated at Hiremyageri village of Yelburga taluk in Koppal district, boundaries of which are mentioned as under, till the next date of hearing.

Towards east - Government school compound; Towards west - PWD Road;

Towards north - Property of one Bondada; Towards south - Property of one Ullagaddi.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

2. Heard learned counsel Sri. Rajashekar B Halli

for the complainants; learned counsel Sri.Abhishek L

Kalled for accused No.1 and learned AGA Sri.Sharad V

Magadum for accused No.2. Perused the entire contempt

petition papers.

3. This Court on 12.12.2024 passed interim order

to the effect that no construction or demolition activity

shall be carried out in the property of the petitioners

bearing Gram Panchayat No.139, measuring East-115,

West-445, North-528 and South-285 situated at Hire

Myageri village of Yelburga Taluka, Koppal District. It is

the submission of the complainants that they are the

owners in possession of the property bearing Gram

Panchayat No.139, situated at Hire Myageri village to the

extent mentioned in the writ petition.

4. Respondent No.8 in pursuance of Tender

Notification dated 17.8.2024 issued work order to

respondent No.9 in the writ petition, who is accused No.1

in the present contempt petition, for construction of Bus

stand in the property belonging to the complainants.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

Learned counsel for the complainants alleged that accused

No.1, who is respondent No.9 in the writ petition, started

construction of bus stand, despite the complainants

bringing to the notice of accused No.1 the interim order

passed by this Court as stated above. It is also submitted

that when accused No.1 failed to obey the interim order

passed by this Court, they brought to the notice of

Superintendent of Police, Koppal, CPI and PSI of Yelburga

Police Station and Divisional Controller of KKRTC, Koppal

Division and as they failed to take any action, it is

submitted that the complainants are before this Court in

the present contempt petition.

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for accused

No.1 would submit that the work order has been issued to

accused No.1-Contractor to carryout the construction of

bus stand at Hire Myageri village of Yelburga Taluk in

Koppal District in pursuance of Tender Notification dated

17.08.2024. Learned counsel for accused No.1 brings to

the notice of this Court the averments made in

paragraphs-7.1 and 8 of the affidavit, wherein accused

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

No.1 has specifically stated that the construction of bus

station is being carried out in Sy.No.147/1 and 147/2 of

Hire Myageri village of Yalaburga Taluk of Koppa and not in

the land of the complainants.

6. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties

and on perusal of the entire contempt petition papers, we

are not in a position to accept the allegations of the

complainants.

7. To invoke the jurisdiction of contempt, there

shall be specific allegation and the complainants shall state

as to when disobedience of order has taken place. In the

absence of specific averments with regard to

contemptuous action of the accused, the Court would not

be inclined to take cognizance of the allegations made in

the complaint. In the instant case, admittedly, the interim

order was passed on 12.12.2024 to the effect that no

construction or demolition activity shall be carried out in

the property of the petitioners bearing Gram Panchayat

No.139 situated at Hire Myageri village of Yelburga Taluk,

Koppal District. The tender notification for construction of

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

bus stand at Hire Myageri village was issued on

17.08.2024 and in pursuance of the same, the work order

in favour of accused No.1 was issued on 25.9.2024.

8. The paragraphs- 5 to 8 of the contempt petition

read as follows:

"5. It is submitted that when the Accused no-1 high handedly started the work over the subject matter of these proceedings, the complainants issued the Legal Notice to the Accused no 1 regarding the interim order passed by the Hon'ble Court in Writ Petition No.107537/2024 dated 12.12.2024. The complainants have produced the copy of the same and marked as ANNEXURE-B.

6. It is submitted that, When the Accused no 1 failed to obey the order of the Hon'ble court, after that complainants were requesting to the concerned officers through the requesting letters sent by the registered post to the Superintendent of Police of Koppal District, C P I and P S I of Yelburga Police station, and Divisional Controller of K K R S Koppal Division Koppal. The Petitioners here with produced the copy of the same and marked as ANNEXURE- C & C-1, D & D-1, E, & F & F-1 respectively.

7. It is submitted that, the Accused no -1 without following the order of the court in hurry manner constructing the bus stand over the property of the complainants. The Complainants here with produced the photo copies of the work started by the accused No. 1 illegally by not respect to the court order and those are marked as ANNEXURE-G TO G- respectively.

8. The complainants requested many times in orally not violate the order of the Hon'ble High Court, but the Accused no-1 not turned up and violated the order of the Hon'ble High court; hence the complainants having left with no other remedy filed this contempt petition against the Accused no -1."

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

9. A reading of the above would only indicate that

the interim order was passed on 12.12.2024 and accused

No.1 failed to comply the interim order of this Court,

though the complainants brought to the notice of accused

No.1 the interim order passed by this Court. It is also

alleged that accused No.1 without following the order of

the Court in a hurried manner started construction of bus

stand over the property of the complainants. The

complaint is bereft of particulars with regard to

disobedience or contemptuous action of accused No.1.

The complainants have failed to give particulars of

commencement of construction whether it is subsequent or

prior to passing of interim order. No particulars have been

stated in the complaint as to when accused No.1

commenced the construction and whether the construction

is continued as on this day. In the absence of any

averments in that regard, this Court would not be in a

position to take cognizance of the alleged contempt.

10. Further, paragraph-4 of the contempt petition

would indicate that the petitioners/complainants are

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14228-DB

HC-KAR

absolute owners in exclusive possession of the property

bearing Gram Panchayat No.139 of Hire Myageri village,

Yelburga Taluk in Koppal District and perpetual injunction

was granted in their favour in OS No.38/2005. However,

the counter affidavit filed by accused No.1 indicates that

the judgment and decree passed in OS No.38/2005 was

set-aside in RA No.32/2012 on the file of learned Senior

Civil Judge and JMFC, Yelburga under judgment dated

21.09.2017.

11. Be that as it may, in the absence of specific

allegations with regard to contemptuous action of accused

No.1, we are not inclined to entertain the present

contempt petition. Accordingly, contempt petition stands

rejected.

Sd/-

(S G PANDIT) JUDGE

Sd/-

(GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE

JTR, CT:VP

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter