Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vishnu B L vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 9289 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9289 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Vishnu B L vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 October, 2025

                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC:41560
                                                         CRL.A No. 1992 of 2025


                      HC-KAR



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
                                              BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
                       CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1992 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2))


                      BETWEEN:

                      VISHNU B L
                      S/O LAKSHMANA D. P.
                      AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                      OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
                      R/O HALAGADKA,
                      DURGADAHALLI VILLAGE,
                      SUNKASALE POST,
                      BALUR HOBLI, MUDIGERE TALUK,
                      CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 122
                                                                    ...APPELLANT
                      (BY SRI. UMESH P.B., ADV. FOR
                       SRI. R. B. DESHPANDE., ADV.)
                      AND:


Digitally signed by
                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
LAKSHMINARAYAN N            BY BALUR POLICE STATION,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    MUDIGERE CIRCLE,
KARNATAKA
                            CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 122

                            (REPRESENTED BY
                            STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                            HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
                            BENGALURU - 560 001)

                      2.    SMT. SUSHEELA
                            D/O SIDDAIAH
                            AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
                            OCC: LABOURER,
                            -2-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:41560
                                   CRL.A No. 1992 of 2025


HC-KAR



   R/O ARALUGUPPE,
   KAIMARA, CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577 131
   NOW RESIDING AT
   BEGADHALLI VILLAGE,
   KAIMARA POST,
   CHIKKAMAGALURU-577 131
                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R., HCGP. FOR R1,
 R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.)


     THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 02.09.2025 IN
CRL.MISC.NO.393/2025 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDL. SESSIONS
AND SPL.JUDGE AT CHIKKAMAGALURU CONSEQUENTLY
DIRECT THE CONCERNED POLICE OF BALUR P.S. MUDIGERE
CIRCLE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT TO ENLARGE THE
APPELLANT/ ACCUSED NO.1 ON BAIL IN CR.NO.24/2025 OF
BALUR P.S MUDIGERE CIRCLE, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT
(REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 115(2),352 R/W 3(5)
BNS 2023 (CORRESPONDING PROVISION SEC.323,504 R/W 34
OF IPC AND SEC.3(1)(r),3(1)(s),3(2)(va) OF SC/ST POA
AMENDMENT ACT 2015 IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

                    ORAL JUDGMENT

1. The appellant - accused No.1 has preferred this

appeal against the order dated 02.09.2025 passed by the

I Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru,

(for short, hereinafter referred to as "trial Court") in

NC: 2025:KHC:41560

HC-KAR

Crl.Misc.No.393/2023 dismissing the bail application filed

under Section 482 of BNSS Act, 2023.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are

referred to as per their status and ranking before the trial

Court.

3. Brief facts leading to this appeal are that, the

Deputy Superintendent of Police, Chikkamagaluru

Sub-division, Chikkamagaluru, has registered a case

against the accused for the offences punishable under

Sections 115(2) and 352 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023 (herein referred as 'BNS Act') r/w section 3(5) of

BNS and sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of SC & ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 (herein

referred as 'SC & ST (POA) Act').

4. Despite service of notice, respondent No.2

remained absent and unrepresented.

5. Heard arguments of both the parties.

NC: 2025:KHC:41560

HC-KAR

6. The Trial Court has allowed the petition in respect

of petitioner Nos.2 to 5 but rejected the bail application

filed by the petitioner No.1-the present appellant. This

impugned order is passed prior to filing of charge sheet. It

is submitted that, now the charge sheet is already filed

against accused Nos.1 to 5 for the aforesaid offences.

7. In the charge sheet, the Investigating Officer has

not stated that the present appellant is required for further

investigation. The charge sheet reveals that the

Investigating Officer has completed the investigation. The

present appellant is not required for further investigation.

The alleged commission of offence is not punishable with

death or imprisonment for life.

8. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances

of the case, since the accused is not required for further

investigation, I proceed to pass the following:

NC: 2025:KHC:41560

HC-KAR

ORDER

(i) Criminal Appeal is allowed.

(ii) The order dated 02.09.2025 passed by the

I Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru,

in Crl.Misc.No.393/2023 wherein the application filed by

the appellant under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita 2023, seeking anticipatory bail, in

respect of present appellant is hereby set aside.

Consequently, the application filed under Section 482 of

BNSS Act, is allowed, subject to the following conditions:

a) Since charge sheet is filed, the appellant-

accused No.1 is directed to surrender himself before the Trial Court.

b) The Trial Court is directed to release the appellant-accused No.1 on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

NC: 2025:KHC:41560

HC-KAR

c) The appellant-accused No.1 shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

d) The appellant-accused No.1 shall not threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses in any manner;

e) The appellant-accused No.1 shall not involve in similar offences in future;

f) The appellant-accused No.1 shall assist the Investigating Officer, if necessary, for further investigation.

Sd/-

(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

DHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter