Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9211 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40930
CRL.P No. 7342 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7342 OF 2024
BETWEEN:
ANJUM AFSANA
W/O A.L. ZUBEAR UR RAHAMAN,
D/O MUZAM ALI TAILOR,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
R/AT 16TH CROSS, NEAR MASJID
E-MUHAJREEN, RANGAPURA ROAD,
GANDHINAGAR, TIPTUR TOWN,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT PIN-572 201.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MALLE GOWDA H.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally
signed by
LAKSHMI T A.L. ZUBEAR UR RAHAMAN
Location: S/O AJAZ AHMED,
High Court
of Karnataka AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/AT LG 6-22ND MAIN, 2ND CROSS,
K.H.B. COLONY, TIPTUR TOWN,
TUMAKURU DISTRICT PIN-572 201.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. MOHAMED UMMAR FAROOQ, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER OF APPELLATE COURT DATED 29.12.2023
IN CRL. APPEAL NO.10029/2023 PASSED BY 5TH ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT TUMAKURU (SITTING AT
TIPTUR) AT ANNEXURE-A.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:40930
CRL.P No. 7342 of 2024
HC-KAR
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
ORAL ORDER
Order dated 29.12.2023 passed by the learned
Sessions Judge in Crl.A No.10029/2023 is assailed in this
petition.
2. The petitioner herein filed a petition under the
provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005 ('Act' for short) before the Court of Civil
Judge (Sr. Dn) and JMFC at Tiptur in Crl.Misc (DVA)
No.81/2021. The exparte order dated 16.09.2021 passed
in the said case, directing the respondent herein to pay
interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to the
minor son was challenged by him before the Sessions
Court. The learned Sessions Judge vide impugned order
dated 29.12.2023 set aside the said exparte order and
remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh disposal
after giving an opportunity to contest the claim seeking
NC: 2025:KHC:40930
HC-KAR
interim maintenance and thereto pass the order in
accordance with law.
3. Considering that the order under appeal was an
exparte order and no notice was issued before passing the
order, further, minor son was not a party and no
opportunity was provided to the petitioner herein to
contest the case, the learned Sessions judge has
remanded the matter to the trial Court for fresh disposal.
There is no error in the impugned judgment.
4. This petition was filed on 08.07.2024. There is
no order of stay passed. Now the case is pending
adjudication before the trial Court. Hence, keeping open
all the contention of both the parties to be raised before
the trial Court, petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ) JUDGE
HB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!