Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9207 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:40951
CRL.A No. 356 of 2024
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 356 OF 2024 (A)
BETWEEN:
N. ASHWINI
W/O. M. N. DEVARAJA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 1356,
14TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS,
KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-560 078.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAJESH B. L., ADVOCATE)
AND:
G. PRASAD REDDY
S/O. LATE G. SREENIVASA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
Digitally signed by RESIDING AT NO. 392,
LAKSHMINARAYAN N
Location: HIGH 2ND CROSS, 13TH MAIN,
3RD BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
BANGALORE-560 034.
...RESPONDENT
(VIDE COURT ORDER DATED: 15.10.2025 NOTICE TO
RESPONDENT IS DISPENSED WITH.)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) CR.PC PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 03.02.2024 PASSED IN
PCR NO.11901/2022 BY THE 46TH A.C.M.M BENGALURU CITY
VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND RESTORE
THE CASE.
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:40951
CRL.A No. 356 of 2024
HC-KAR
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS
DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. The appellant - complainant has preferred this appeal
against the order passed by the Trial Court dated
03.02.2024, whereby the complaint came to be dismissed
for non-prosecution.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that
the Trial Court has erred in coming to the conclusion that
the appellant has made a wrong observation that appellant
had not been represented in the PCR from 31.03.2023. It
is notable that the case was never posted on 31.03.2023
before the Court.
3. The reason for not representing the case on
03.02.2024 was because the advocate on record was not
keeping well. The absence of representation on
03.02.2024 before the Trial Court is not an intentional one
NC: 2025:KHC:40951
HC-KAR
but for a bonfide reason. On all these grounds, he sought
to allow this appeal.
4. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for
the appellant, it is just and proper to provide one more
opportunity to the complainant to prosecute this case.
Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
i. The appeal is allowed.
ii. The order passed by the Trial Court in
PCR.No.11901/2022 dated 03.02.2024 is
hereby set aside.
iii. The PCR No.11901/2022 on the file of XLVI
ACMM, Bengaluru, shall be restored.
iv. The complainant is directed to appear before
the Trial Court on 20.11.2025, without seeking
any further notice from the Trial Court.
v. The complainant shall take necessary steps to
prosecute this case.
NC: 2025:KHC:40951
HC-KAR
vi. Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the trial Court for taking necessary action.
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
DHA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!