Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9204 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13893
RSA No. 100767 of 2017
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100767 OF 2017 (SP-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. H.M. SOMASHEKHARA SWAMY
S/O. LATE MARISWAMY,
AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. HATCHOLLI VILLAGE, TQ. SIRUGUPPA,
DIST. BALLARI-583122.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. GODE NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
HEERA RAM JEE S/O. DEEPA RAM JEE,
AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. SIRUGUPPA, TQ. SIRUGUPPA,
DIST. BALLARI-583121.
Digitally
signed by
YASHAVANT
...RESPONDENT
NARAYANKAR
YASHAVANT
NARAYANKAR Date: (BY SRI. S.K. NADAMANI, ADVOCATE)
2025.10.16
10:47:42
+0530
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, 1908,
PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE TRIAL COURT RECORDS AND ALLOW THE
APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DTD:15.11.2016
PASSED BY THE COURT OF I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
JUDGE BALLARI, IN R.A.NO.43/2014 AND THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DTD 01.09.2014, PASSED BY THE LEARNED II ADDL. SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE, BALLARI IN O.S. NO.108/2011 AND THE SUIT MAY BE
DISMISSED AS PRAYED FOR AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13893
RSA No. 100767 of 2017
HC-KAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI)
Learned counsel appearing for both the sides, together file
a petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, recording the settlement reached between the
parties. The appellant and the respondent are present along with
their counsels and are duly identified.
2. On perusal of the compromise petition, this Court is
satisfied that the said settlement is legal and is in the interest of
both the parties. The appellant who is present before this Court
submits that he would pay a sum of Rs.19,00,000/- within the
stipulated period mentioned in the compromise petition and on
his failing to pay the said amount to the respondent, the
respondent is at liberty to execute the decree for specific
performance of the contract of agreement of sale. Therefore, the
compromise entered into between the parties is accepted.
3. The impugned judgments of the Trial Court and the
First Appellate Court are set-aside and the appeal is disposed off
in terms of the compromise petition. A decree to be drawn in
NC: 2025:KHC-D:13893
HC-KAR
terms of the compromise petition and the compromise petition
shall be part of the decree. The Court fee paid is to be refunded
to the appellant as per law.
SD/-
(C M JOSHI) JUDGE
RKM/CT:PA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!