Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri G S Suresh Gupta vs Sri Srinivas N
2025 Latest Caselaw 9186 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9186 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 October, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri G S Suresh Gupta vs Sri Srinivas N on 15 October, 2025

Author: Ravi V Hosmani
Bench: Ravi V Hosmani
                                               -1-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC:40960
                                                      CRL.RP No. 825 of 2025


                  HC-KAR




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                        DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025
                                             BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
                       CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 825 OF 2025
                 BETWEEN:

                       SRI G.S. SURESH GUPTA
                       S/O G.B. SUBRAMANYA SETTY,
                       AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
                       R/A NO. 23/4-1, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
                       1ST CROSS, SWIMMING POOL ROAD,
                       MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT,
                       BENGALURU - 560 086,
                       MOBILE NO 9945587569.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                 (BY SRI P VITTAL SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
                 AND:

                       SRI SRINIVAS N.,
                       S/O K. NAGARAJ,
                       AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
                       R/A NO. 50, 1ST 'A' CROSS,
Digitally signed by    MODEL LIC COLONY,
GEETHAKUMARI
                       BASAVESHWARNAGAR,
PARLATTAYA S
                       BENGALURU - 560 070.
Location: High                                                ...RESPONDENT
Court of Karnataka
                 (BY SRI SURESH D. DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE)
                      THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
                 U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE
                 PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY
                 BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DTD 06.03.2025
                 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.627/2023 BY THE HONBLE LII ADDL.
                 CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-53) IN
                 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.04.2023, PASSED BY
                 THE LRD. IV ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, COURT
                                -2-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC:40960
                                         CRL.RP No. 825 of 2025


HC-KAR




OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU (SCCH-6) IN C.C.NO.6241/
2022, CONVICTING THE ACCUSED. AND ETC.,

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING ON I.A., THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI

                          ORAL ORDER

Challenging judgment dated 06.03.2025 passed by LII

Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-53) in

Crl.A.no.627/2023 confirming judgment of conviction and order

of sentence dated 15.04.2023 passed by IV Addl. Small Causes

Judge & ACMM Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru (SCH-6) in

C.C.no.6241/2022, this revision petition is filed.

2. Learned counsel for parties submitted that during

pendency of revision petition, parties have entered into

settlement, wherein respondent/complainant agreed to pay

sum of Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees three lakh and fifty thousand

only) in full and final settlement towards respondent's claim. It

is agreed between parties that sum of Rs.2,40,000/- deposited

by petitioner is permitted to be withdrawn by respondent and

balance amount of Rs.1,10,000/- is agreed to be paid by

petitioner in two installments i.e., Rs.55,000/- on or before

NC: 2025:KHC:40960

HC-KAR

20.12.2026 and remaining amount of Rs.55,000/- on or before

20.02.2026 respectively. It is also agreed between parties that

in case of default in payment of said amount, complainant

would be entitled for recovery of entire cheque amount of

Rs.4,75,000/-.

3. Terms of Joint Memo, reads as under:

"JOINT MEMO

1) The petitioner submits that the respondent had filed a proceeding under Section 138 of NI Act for the dishonour of the cheque for a sum of Rs.4,75,000/- in CC No.6241/2022 before the IV Addl. Small Causes Judge and ACMM Court of Small Causes, Bangalore. The said Court was pleased to convict the Petitioner herein and sentenced to pay a sum of Rs.4,80,000/- as per the Conviction order and sentence dated 15/04/2023.

2) It is further submitted that against the above said conviction order and sentence the petitioner has preferred a Criminal Appeal in Crl. Appeal No.627/2023 before the Hon'ble LII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore. The said appeal was also dismissed on 06/03/2025 by confirming the order of the trial court.

Against the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the present Criminal Revision Petition. By the intervention of this Hon'ble Court, both parties have agreed to settle the above matter as full as final settlement for a total sum of Rs.3,50,000/- which includes the 50% of the amount totally amounting to Rs.2,40,000/- deposited before the Hon'ble Trial Court by the petitioner. The balance amount of Rs.1,10,000/- is agreed to be paid in 2 equal installments as follows:

a) A sum of Rs.55,000/- on or before 20/12/2026

b) Balance sum of Rs.55,000 on or before 20/02/2026.

NC: 2025:KHC:40960

HC-KAR

The respondent has duly agreed for the above terms of payment.

3) It is further submitted that the total amount of Rs.2,40,000/-deposited by the petitioner before trial Court may be ordered to release in favour of the respondent. The respondent is having no other claim against the petitioner in respect of the subject Cheque. In case of default, the complainant is entitle for entire cheque amount ie. Rs. 4,75,000-.

Wherefore it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to pass suitable orders in terms of this joint memo in the interest of justice and equity.

4. Perused Joint Memo. Same is taken on record.

5. Parties are present and identified by their respective

counsel. On interaction, they have stated that terms of joint

memo were explained to them and after understanding same,

they have affirmed it out of their free will and volition without

there being any threat, coercion or undue influence from

anybody. Joint Memo is duly signed by both parties, whose

signatures are identified by their respective counsel.

6. In view of terms of joint memo, this Criminal Revision

Petition is allowed; judgments dated 06.03.2025 passed by LII

Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-53) in

Crl.A.no.627/2023 and 15.04.2023 passed by IV Addl. Small

NC: 2025:KHC:40960

HC-KAR

Causes Judge & ACMM Court of Small Causes, Bengaluru (SCH-

6) in C.C.no.6241/2022, are set aside.

Sd/-

(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE

Psg*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter