Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yousuf S/O Abdul Razzak vs Kalyanrao And Anr
2025 Latest Caselaw 9850 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9850 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Yousuf S/O Abdul Razzak vs Kalyanrao And Anr on 5 November, 2025

                                             -1-
                                                         NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549
                                                    MFA No. 202654 of 2019


                   HC-KAR




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                           BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 202654 OF 2019 (MV-I)
                   BETWEEN:

                   YOUSUF S/O. ABDUL RAZZAK,
                   AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: SKILED WORK,
                   CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDING, NOW NIL,
                   R/O: MALEGAON, TQ: & DIST: BIDAR-584101.
                                                                ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI. BABU H METAGUDDA,ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   KALYANRAO
                        S/O. HANUMANTHRAO,
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: BUSINESS,
Digitally signed        R/O: H.NO. 9-12-95,
by SUMITRA              GURU NAGAR COLONY, BIDAR-584101.
SHERIGAR
Location: HIGH     2.  THE MANAGER
COURT OF
KARNATAKA              SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
                       BRANCH OFFICE NO. 302, 3RD FLOORS & S CORNER,
                       BUILDING FLOWER PLOT NO. 48, HOSPITAL ROAD,
                       OPP: BOWRING LADY CURZON HOSPITAL,
                       SHIVAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE-585101.
                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. SANGEETA BHADRASHETTY, ADV. FOR R2;
                   V/O. DATED 07.01.2021, NOTICE TO R1 D/W)

                        THIS MFA IS FILED U/S. 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO
                   A) CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN MVC NO.572/2015 ON THE FILE
                   OF THE ADDL. MACT AND PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549
                                    MFA No. 202654 of 2019


HC-KAR




AQT BIDAR. B) ALLOW THIS APPEAL AND MODIFY THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 18.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC
NO. 572/2015 BY ADDL. MACT AND PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND CJM AT BIDAR AND ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION
FROM 8,59,694/- WITH 6% INTEREST TO RS. 20,00,000/-
WITH 12% INTEREST.

    THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE P SREE SUDHA


                       ORAL JUDGMENT

1. This appeal is preferred by the claimant against

the Judgment and award dated 18.07.2018 in MVC

No.572/2015 by the Additional MACT and Principal Senior

Civil Judge and CJM, Bidar (for short 'the tribunal') seeking

enhancement of the compensation.

2. The injured claimant filed claim petition before

the tribunal seeking compensation of Rs.20,00,000/- along

with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. The tribunal

after considering the entire evidence on record, awarded

sum of Rs.8,59,694/- along with interest at the rate of 9%

per annum from the date of petition till the date of

realization. Aggrieved by the said Judgment and award, the

claimant preferred the present appeal and mainly contended

NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549

HC-KAR

that, the amounts granted under the Judgment and award

are adequate.

3. It is stated that, the claimant was earning a sum

of Rs.24,000/- by labour work and he was 25 years as on the

date of the accident. The Doctor assessed the disability at

42% to the right limb, but the tribunal considered 20%.

Since the claimant is a skilled labourer, he cannot do labour

work after the accident and thus, the functional disability is

to be taken at 100%. Further learned counsel for the

claimant/appellant submits that, the amounts granted under

different heads are meager and therefore, requests for

enhancement of the compensation.

4. Though the claimant has stated that, he was

earning a sum of Rs.24,000/- he has not produced any

income proof. He met with accident on 06.02.2015. As per

the guidelines of the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authority, for the year 2015, his income is to be taken at

Rs.8,000/- per month. The claimant has produced wound

certificate marked at Ex.P.4. The wound certificate shows

NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549

HC-KAR

that, the claimant suffered crush injuries to right anke

measuring 10X6 cm cut and lacerated injuries to right leg

measuring 4X3 and 4X2 cm, compound fracture of tibia and

fibula, degloving right ankle and fracture of 2nd and 4th

metatarsal of right foot. The claimant has not produced the

X-ray report. As per the disability certificate marked at

Ex.P.19, the Doctor observed that, the claimant suffered

healed operative sca over right leg and foot tenderness

present antalgic gait present shortening of 2 cms present. As

per the Radiology report dated 06.01.2018 there is

malunited fracture of tibia and fibula. Considering the above

aspects, this Court finds it reasonable to consider the

disability at 25% instead of 20%. Hence, the loss of future

earning capacity be as under:

Rs.8,000/- X 12 X 15 X 25% = Rs.3,60,000/-.

5. The tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.4,12,694/-

towards medical expenses which needs no interference. The

claimant was hospitalized for 15 days. Considering the

nature of injuries, occupation of the claimant and other

NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549

HC-KAR

relevant factors, this Court finds it reasonable to grant a sum

of Rs.75,000/- towards pain and sufferings. A sum of

Rs.25,000/- towards loss of amenities and a sum of

Rs.48,000/- towards loss of income during laid up period is

already awarded by the tribunal, hence, needs no

interference. This Court finds it reasonable to award a sum of

Rs.30,000/- towards transportation, extra nourishment and

attendant charges. Hence, the total compensation would be

as under:

Sl.No. Heads of compensation Amount 1 Loss of future income Rs.3,60,000/- 2 Pain and sufferings Rs.75,000/- 3 Loss of amenities Rs.25,000/- 4 Loss of income during laid up Rs.48,000/-

period 5 Transportation, extra Rs.30,000/-

nourishment and attendant charges 6 Medical expenses Rs.4,12,694/-

Total Rs.9,50,694/-

6. The claimant is entitled for total compensation of

Rs.9,50,694/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per

annum from the date of petition till the date of realization, as

against Rs.8,59,694/- awarded by the tribunal.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549

HC-KAR

7. Learned counsel for the Insurance company

submits that, the Insurance company has deposited the

compensation amount along with interest awarded by the

tribunal.

8. Accordingly, the following:

ORDER

(i) The appeal is allowed in part;

(ii) The claimant is entitled for total

compensation of Rs.9,50,694/- along with interest

at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of

petition till the date of realization, as against

Rs.8,59,694/- awarded by the tribunal;

(iii) The Insurance company is directed to

deposit the enhanced compensation of Rs.91,000/-

along with interest within a period of one month

from the date of this petition;

NC: 2025:KHC-K:6549

HC-KAR

(iv) On such deposit, the claimant is

permitted to withdraw the entire compensation

amount along with interest accrued on it.

sd/-

(P SREE SUDHA) JUDGE

SVH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter