Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sachin B @ Kambali Sachin vs State By Hosanagara Police
2025 Latest Caselaw 9710 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9710 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sachin B @ Kambali Sachin vs State By Hosanagara Police on 3 November, 2025

                                                   -1-
                                                                 NC: 2025:KHC:44194
                                                           CRL.A No. 2108 of 2025


                      HC-KAR



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                             DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
                                                 BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
                       CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2108 OF 2025 (U/S 14(A) (2))
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SACHIN B. @ KAMBALI SACHIN
                            S/O BHEEMAPPA,
                            AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

                      2.    MANJUNATHA. H. K @ MANJA HARATE,
                            S/O KANNAPPA HEBBAYLU,
                            AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,

                      3.    AVINASH. B. H @ J. C. B. AVINASHA,
                            S/O HARIYAPPA B M
                            AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

                      4.    SMT. AMRUTHA,
                            W/O ESHWARA,
                            AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

                            ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
Digitally signed by
LAKSHMINARAYAN N            HEBBAILU VILLAGE,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                    PURAPPEMANE POST,
KARNATAKA
                            HOSANAGAR TALUK,
                            SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 417
                                                                      ...APPELLANTS
                      (BY SRI. BIMBADHAR M. GOWDA, ADVOCATE)


                      AND:

                      1.    STATE BY HOSANAGARA POLICE
                            HOSANAGARA POLICE STATION,
                            HOSANAGARA - 577 417.
                                 -2-
                                              NC: 2025:KHC:44194
                                        CRL.A No. 2108 of 2025


HC-KAR



       REPRESENTED BY SPP,
       HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
       ATTACHED TO THE OFFICE OF
       ADVOCATE GENERAL,
       HIGH Court OF KARNATAKA,
       BANGALORE.

2.     SATISHA @ TAMBI,
       S/O. KRISHNAPPA, 32 YEARS,
       R/O. HEBBAILU VILLAGE,
       PURAPPEMANE POST,
       HOSANAGAR TALUK,
       SHIMOGA DISTRICT. 577 417.
                                                   ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RANGASWAMY R., HCGP FOR R1,
 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED: 03.11.2025
 R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED.)

        THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT
BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2nd ADDL. DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, AT SHIMOGGA IN CRL.MISC.NO.745/2025
DTD 23.08.2025 AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND BE PLEASED TO
ENLARGE      THE   APPELLANTS    ON   BAIL    IN   CR.NO.55/2025
REGISTERED BY THE HOSANAGAR POLICE, PENDING ON THE
FILE    OF   THE   ADDL.   DISTRICT   AND     SESSIONS    JUDGE,
SHIMOGGA,           FOR       THE           OFFENCES           P/U/S
352,118(1),115(2),351(2),109(1)       R/W    190   OF   BNS,    U/S
3(1)(r)(s),3(2)(va) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT IN THE EVENT OF
ARREST.


        THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                    -3-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC:44194
                                              CRL.A No. 2108 of 2025


HC-KAR



CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA

                          ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Accused 2 to 5 before the Trial Court who are

appellants 1 to 4 before this Court, have preferred this

appeal against the impugned order dated 23.08.2025 in

Crl.Misc.No.745/2025 passed by the II Additional District

and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, by which order the

Anticipatory Bail filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023,

came to be dismissed.

2. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that, on the

basis of complaint filed by one Satisha @ Tambi,

Hosanagara Police have registered the case in

Crime No.55/2025 against accused 1 to 5 for the

commission of offences under sections 352, 118(1),

115(2), 351(2), 109(1), 190 of BNS, 2023 and sections

3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST (Prevention of

Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.

3. The appellants have filed application under Section

482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of Anticipatory bail. Same

NC: 2025:KHC:44194

HC-KAR

came to be rejected by the Trial Court on 23.08.2025.

Being aggrieved by this order, the appellants have

preferred this appeal.

4. I have examined the materials placed before this

Court. Hosanagara Police have already submitted charge

sheet against accused 1 to 5 for the offences under

sections 352, 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 109(1), 190 of BNS,

2023 and sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC & ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.

5. The substance of Column 17 of the charge sheet

reads as hereunder:

"17. ೇ ನ ಸಂ ಪ ಾ ಾಂಶ

ೊಸನಗರ ೕ ಾ ೆ ಗು ೆ ನಂ: 55/2025 ಕಲಂ: 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2) ಸ ತ 190 .ಎ!.ಎ ಮತು ಕಲಂ:3(1) (ಆ$)(ಎ ). 3(2)(%ಎ) ಎ . /ಎ .& 'ದು)ಪ* ಾ+)-2015.

ಈ ಪ-ಕರಣದಲ / ೊಂದವ ಾದ ಾ -01 1-ೕ ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವರು ಪ21ಷ4 5ಾ'ಯ "ಆ7ಕ ಾ8ಟಕ" 5ಾ':ೆ ಾಗೂ ಎ1. ಮಂಜು @ n®ègï ಮಂಜು ರವರು "7ೕವರ 5ಾ':ೆ", ಎ2. ಸ<! @ ಕಂಬ> ಸ<! ಮತು ಎ3. ಮಂಜು ಾಥ@ ಹರAೆ ಮಂಜರವರು "ಈ*ಗರ" 5ಾ':ೆ ಾಗೂ

NC: 2025:KHC:44194

HC-KAR

ಎ4.ಅ% ಾಶ@ 5ೆ. . ಅ% ಾಶರವರು "ಮ*Cಾಳ" 5ಾ':ೆ, ಎ5. 1-ೕಮ' ಆಮೃತರವರು "ಪF5ಾ2" 5ಾ':ೆ ೇ2ರುGಾ ೆಂದು ಾ - 16ರವರು Hೕ*ರುವ IಾಖKಾ'ಗ>ಂದ ದೃಢಪ&4ರುತIೆ.

ೊಸನಗರ Gಾಲೂ/M ಪNರOೆP ಮ ೆ :ಾ-ಮ ºÉ¨Éâö樀 Cಾ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವ2:ೆ ಮಧROಾನ Sಾಡುವ ಅUಾRಸ%ದ)2ಂದ ಮಧRCಾನ ಹುಡುV ೊಂಡು 7 ಾಂಕ:31-07-2025ರಂದು ಸಂ5ೆ 04-45ಗಂAೆ:ೆ ಬ ಾ4WಂX ಕYೆ:ೆ ೋಗು'ರುCಾಗ ºÉ¨Éâö樀 Cಾ ೇ ನ ಎ5 1-ೕಮ' ಅಮೃGಾ ರವರ <ಕ! ¸ÁÖ¯ï ಮುಂUಾಗದ ಜಗ ಕAೆ4ಯ [ೕKೆ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವ2:ೆ ಪ2ಚಯ%ದ) Iೋ]ಾ ೋಪ ಾ ಪತ-ದ ಾಲಂ ನಂ 12ರ / ನಮೂ7 ದ J1. &ಲ/$ ಮಂಜು, ಎ2.ಕಂಬ>^ ಸ<!, ಎ3.ಹರAೆ ಮಂಜು, ಎ4, 5ೆ ಅ% ಾಶ ರವರು ಮಧROಾನ Sಾಡು'zÀÝ2ಂದ ಾ - 01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವರು ತನಗೂ ಸ_ಲP ಎ ೆ` ೊಡುವಂGೆ ೇ>Iಾಗ ಎ1 &ಲ/$ ಮಂಜು ರವರು ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ @ ತಂ ರವ2:ೆ ೋ:ೋ ೊKೆಯ ಸೂaೇಮಗ ೆ Hೕನು ನಮb 5ೊGೆ:ೆ ಎ ೆ` ೊ*'ೕ+ೕ ೋ Hೕನು Vೕಳc 5ಾ'ಯವನು Hನ:ೆ ಏ ೆ JuÉÚ ೊಡeೇಕು ಎಂದು eೈ7ದ)2ಂದ ಾ -01.ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವರು ತನ:ೆ ಏ ೆ eೈಯು'ೕ2 ಎಂದು ೇ>Iಾಗ ಎ1.n®ègï ಮಂಜು, ಎ2.ಕಂಬ> ಸ<!, ಎ3.ಹರAೆ ಮಂಜ, ಎ4.5ೆ ಅ% ಾಶ ಎಲ/ರೂ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವರನು *ದು ೊಂಡು Hನ:ಾRPÉÆÃ ಕೂಡeೇಕು ೋ:ೋ ೊKೆಯ ಸೂaೆಮಗ ೆ ಎಂದು ತaಾ^* ದೂ*Iಾಗ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ ರವರನು ೊKೆ Sಾಡುವ ಉIೆ)ೕಶ7ಂದ ಎ1. n®ègï ಮಂಜು C¯Éèà 7)zÀÝ ಒಂದು Iೊ ೆ`ಯನು Gೆ:ೆದು ೊಂಡು ಎ ೆ` eೇ ೇ ೋ ¤ನ:ೆ Hನ ನು ಡುವN7ಲ/ ಎನು Gಾ ತKೆಯ [ೕKೆ ೊYೆ7ದು) ಆಷ4ರ / C°èUÉ ಬಂದ ಎ5.1-ೕಮ' ಅಮbGಾ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ@ ತಂ©ರವ2:ೆ ಈ ೊ ¯Éಯ ಸೂaೆಮ:ಾ ಬಂIಾUɯÁè ಗKಾAೆ Sಾ* ೋಗುGಾ ೆ ಾ ೊ-ೕ ಎಂದು ೈಗ>ಂದ ೊYೆIಾಗ ಾಗೂ ಆKೆzÀÝ ಎ2.ಕಂಬ> ಸ<!, ಎ3.ಹರAೆ ಮಂಜ, ಎ4, 5ೆ ಅ% ಾಶ ರವರು ೈಗ>ಂದ [ೖ ೈ:ೆ ೊYೆದು ಾ Hಂದ ಒzÀÄÝ ತ>^Iಾಗ ಾ -01 ಸ'ೕಶ

NC: 2025:KHC:44194

HC-KAR

@ ತಂ ರವರು ಚರಂ*:ೆ Iಾ)ಗ ಎ1.n®ègï ಮಂಜು Hನ ನು ಉ>ಸುವN7ಲ/Cೆಂದು ಪNನಃ ೊYೆಯಲು ಬರು'ರುCಾಗ ಅಷ4ರ / C°èUÉ ಓ* ಬಂದ ಾ -02 ಾlೕm ಾಗೂ ಾ -03,ಅರುಣ, ಾ -04.ಸು ೇಶ ಮತು ಇತರರು ರವರು ಗKಾAೆ * ಾ -01.ಸ'ಶ @ತಂ ರವರನು ಚರಂ*oಂದ [ೕKೆ' ಉಪಚ2ಸು'Iಾಗ ಎ1. &ಲ/$ ಮಂಜು ೋಗುCಾಗ ತನ ೈಯ /ದ) Iೊ ೆ`ಯನು C¯Éèà ಾ* ಇವತು ಉ>ದು ೊಂ*7)ೕpಾ ಇ ೊ [b ಗೂ Hನ ನು lೕವ ಸ ತ ಡುವN7ಲ/Cೆಂದು eೆದ2 ೆ ಾV ೋqರುGಾ ೆ, [ೕಲrಂಡಂGೆ ಆ ೋsಗaೆಲ/ರೂ ಾt-01ರವ2:ೆ ಅCಾಚRCಾq eೈಯುGಾ 5ಾ' Hಂದ ೆ Sಾ* ಎ1 &ಲ/$ ಮಂಜು ರವರು Iೊ ೆ`oಂದ ಾಗೂ ಎ2 2ಂದ ಎ5 ರವರು ೈಗ>ಂದ ಹ¯Éè Sಾ* ಚರಂ*:ೆ ತ>^ದ)2ಂದ ಾ -01ರವ2:ೆ ತKೆ:ೆ Oೆಟು4 ದು) " ಾSಾನR ಸ_ರೂಪದ" :ಾಯCಾqರುವNದು ತHvೆoಂದ ದೃಢಪ&4ರುತIೆ.

     DzÀÝjAzÀ                     J1.gÀªÀgÀ                 «gÀÄzÀÝ
     PÀ®A:109(1),115(2),118(1),352.351(2)            ¸À»vÀ   190

©.J£ï.J¸ï ªÀÄvÀÄÛ PÀ®A:3(1)(Dgï)(J¸ï), 3(2) («J) J¸ï.¹/J¸ï.n wzÀÄÝ¥Àr ಾ+)-2015 ಮತು ಎ2 2ಂದ ಎ5. ರವqನವರ %ರುದw ಕಲಂ:115(2),352 ಸ ತ 190 .ಎ!.ಎ ಮತು ಕಲಂ:3(1)(ಆ$)(ಎ ).3(2)(%J) ಎ . /ಎ .& 'ದು)ಪ* ಾ+)- 2015 ಕಲಂಗಳ 2ೕGಾR Iೋ]ಾ ೋಪ ಾ ಪತ-ವನು ಘನ ಾRpಾಲಯ ೆr ಸ / Iೆ. ಾಗೂ ಈ ಪ-ಕರಣದ / ಇH ತ ೆ ಪFರಕ ಾtWಗಳನು ಸ ಾ ಸಂಗ- Sಾ£Àå ಾRpಾಲಯPÉÌ ಕಲಂ:193(8) .ಎ!.ಎ .ಎ 2ೕvÁå ೆಚುyವ2pಾq HCೇ7 ೊಳ^KಾಗುವNದು."

6. On perusal of the charge sheet, it is crystal clear that

present appellants are not required for further

investigation. It is submitted that accused No.1 - Tiller

NC: 2025:KHC:44194

HC-KAR

Manju who has assaulted the injured with club, is in

judicial custody. The role of the appellants is that they

have assaulted the injured with their hands. The charge

sheet reveals that CW-1 sustained only simple injuries.

7. The alleged commission of offences are not

punishable with death or imprisonment for life. The Trial

Court has dismissed the application on the ground that the

accused are required for investigation. Since the charge

sheet is already filed, the accused are not required for

investigation. Even during the investigation, the

Investigating Officer had not issued the arrest notice

under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023.

8. Considering the above facts and circumstances, it is

just and proper to allow this appeal. Accordingly, I proceed

to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The Criminal Appeal is allowed.

NC: 2025:KHC:44194

HC-KAR

(ii) The impugned order dated 23.08.2025 in

Crl.Misc.No.745/2025 passed by the II Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga, is set

aside. Consequently, the application filed under

Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 is allowed.

(iii) Appellants shall be released on bail on

executing self-bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with one

surety each for the likesum to the satisfaction of

the Special Court.

(iv) Appellants shall not tamper or threaten the

prosecution witnesses in any manner.

(v) Appellants are directed to appear before

the Trial Court on all the dates of hearing.

Sd/-

(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE

DHA

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter