Tuesday, 21, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri P Rajendra Prasad S/O P. Anjinappa vs Shri Ramakrishna Sa Pawar S/O Late ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 9695 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9695 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Shri P Rajendra Prasad S/O P. Anjinappa vs Shri Ramakrishna Sa Pawar S/O Late ... on 3 November, 2025

                                                   -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC-D:14947
                                                         CRL.RP No. 100431 of 2024


                       HC-KAR




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD

                      DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                           BEFORE

                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH

                  CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100431 OF 2024
                                 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS))

                      BETWEEN:

                      SHRI. P RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O. P. ANJINAPPA,
                      AGE. 42 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
                      R/O. NEAR MARKANDESHWARA TEMPLE,
                      HOSAPETE-BALLARI MAIN ROAD,
                      KUREKOPPA VILLAGE-583123,
                      TQ. SANDUR, DIST. BALLARI.
                                                                        ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. J. BASAVARAJ, ADVOCATE)


                      AND:

                      SHRI. RAMAKRISHNA SA PAWAR
                      S/O. LATE HANUMANTHA SA PAWAR,
Digitally signed by   AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS,
SAMREEN AYUB
DESHNUR               R/O. W.NO.1, JANATHA COLONY,
Location: HIGH        TORANAGALLU VILLAGE-583123,
COURT OF              TQ. SANDUR, DIST. BALLARI.
KARNATAKA                                                              ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR G., ADVOCATE AND
                           SRI. D.V. PATTAR, ADVOCATE)
                            THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION
                      438 R/W 442 OF BNSS, PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF
                      CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE IV ADDL. DISTRICT AND
                      SESSIONS JUDGE (EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL COURT) BALLARI IN
                      CRL.A.NO.24/2024 DATED 24.08.2024 AND THE JUDGMENT OF
                      CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE
                      AND JMFC, BALLARI IN .C.C. NO.1288/2020 DATED 20.04.2024 FOR
                      THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT AND SET
                      THE PETITIONER AT LIBERTY IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:14947
                                      CRL.RP No. 100431 of 2024


HC-KAR




      THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                         ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH)

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a compromise

petition under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments

Act, 1881, read with Section 320 of Cr.P.C., stating that the

matter has been settled between the petitioner and the

respondent.

2. The averments of the said compromise petition

from paragraph No.5 onwards are reads as under:

"5. Hence, with intervention of elders and their advice the petitioner and Respondent have arrived at compromise and accordingly the following are the terms and conditions:

a) That the Respondent has voluntarily consented for the said compromise petition without being subjected to coercion or threat and shall withdraw all the allegations made against the Petitioner herein.

b) That the Respondent has voluntarily consented/agreed for compounding of the

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14947

HC-KAR

offences punishable u/s 147 of the NI Act R/w Section 320 of CrPC, 1973 with the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act with the kind leave of this Hon'ble Court.

c) That Respondent shall institute any case against Petitioner with respect to the same cause of the action.

d) That the petitioner and Respondent has agreed to settle the matter for one time settlement in terms of their settlement agreement dated 29.10.2025 i.e., That Petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.

17,00,000/-(in words Rupees Seventeen Lakhs) to the Complainant and the Petitioner has already paid Rs.10,00,000 and the remaining amount of Rs. 7,00,000 (in words Rupees Seven lakhs only) shall be paid on or before 29.11.2025 and in lieu of the security of the same a post-dated cheque dated 29.11.2025 bearing No. 535078 has been handed over to the Complainant. The Petitioner shall also undertake to fulfill the terms of settlement as agreed thereof.

e) If Petitioner defaults at paying the remainder balance of Rs. 10,00,000/- the Respondent is at liberty to recourse any remedy

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14947

HC-KAR

In law against the default of reminder payment against the Petitioner only.

f) The Respondent has no Impendent for Immediate release of petitioner who is currently serving the sentence imposed upon him.

This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the relative of the Petitioner for compounding of the offence punishable under section 138 of NI Act on his behalf as the petitioner is currently serving the sentence imposed by the Courts Below."

3. Considering the averments made in the

compromise petition, there is no embargo on this Court to

record the settlement.

4. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following:

ORDER.

i) The petition is allowed in terms of the

compromise petition.

ii) The judgment dated 20.04.2024 passed in

C.C.No.12888/2020 by the Principal Civil

Judge and JMFC, Ballari, and confirmed in

Criminal Appeal No.24/2024 vide judgment

dated 24.08.2024 by the IV Additional

NC: 2025:KHC-D:14947

HC-KAR

District and Sessions Judge (Exclusive

Dedicated Commercial Court), Ballari, are

hereby set aside.

iii) The petitioner/accused is acquitted for the

offence punishable under Section 138 of the

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

iv) The bail bonds executed, if any, stands

cancelled.

v) The Registry is directed to communicate this

order to the Superintendent of Prison,

Ballari.

vi) The Superintendent of Prison is directed to

release the accused forthwith, in case, if he

is not required in any other cases.

vii) In view of the disposal of the main petition,

pending I.As, if any, are disposed of.

Sd/-

(S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter