Monday, 20, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Bhuvanendragowda vs Assessment Unit
2025 Latest Caselaw 10183 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 10183 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Mr. Bhuvanendragowda vs Assessment Unit on 13 November, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                                    -1-
                                                                NC: 2025:KHC:46302
                                                             WP No. 34103 of 2025


                       HC-KAR



                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                                DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025

                                                 BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 34103 OF 2025 (T-IT)

                      BETWEEN:

                      MR. BHUVANENDRAGOWDA
                      S/O LATE GAVI RANGE GOWDA
                      AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
                      (SENIOR CITIZENS BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED)
                      RESIDING AT 332, 4TH MAIN ROAD,
                      VIJAYANAGARA, BANGALORE NORTH,
                      BANGALORE - 560040.
                                                                      ...PETITIONER
                      (BY SRI. JANAK PUROHIT., ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

Digitally signed by   1.   ASSESSMENT UNIT
JUANITA
THEJESWINI                 NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                   INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,
KARNATAKA                  2ND FLOOR, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM,
                           NEW DELHI - 110003.

                      2.   INCOME TAX OFFICER,
                           WARD 3(2)(1), BANGALORE,
                           BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
                           6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
                           BANGALORE - 560095.

                      3.   INCOME TAX OFFICER,
                           WARD 5(1)(1), BANGALORE,
                                     -2-
                                                    NC: 2025:KHC:46302
                                                WP No. 34103 of 2025


 HC-KAR



       BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,
       6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,
       BANGALORE - 560095

4.     PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER
       OF INCOME TAX,
       KARNATAKA AND GOA,
       CR BUILDING, NO. 1, QUEENS ROAD,
       BANGALORE - 560001.
                                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATE)


        THIS   WP     IS   FILED    UNDER     ARTICLE      226   OF    THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (I) QUASHING THE
IMPUGNED NOTICE DATED 29.03.2023 BEARING DIN AND NOTICE
NO.       ITBA/AST/S/148-1/2022-23/1051587776(1)           ISSUED           BY
RESPONDENT NO. 3 UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE INCOME-TAX
ACT, 1961 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 (ANNEXURE A) AND
ETC.

        THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                              ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:

(i) Quashing the impugned notice dated 29.03.2023 bearing DIN and Notice no. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-

23/1051587776(1) issued by Respondent no. 3 under

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure 'A');

(ii) Quashing the impugned order dated 29.03.2023 bearing DIN & Notice No. ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022- 23/1051538421(1) issued by Respondent no. 3 under Section 148A(d) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure A1);

(iii) Quashing the impugned Assessment order dated 29.12.2023 bearing DIN no. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023- 24/1059175302(1) passed by Respondent no. 1 under Section 147 read with section 144 read with section 144B of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure B);

(iv) Quashing the impugned Computation Sheet dated 29.12.2023 bearing DIN no. ITBA/AST/S/114/2023- 24/1059175334(1) passed by Respondent no. 1 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure B1);

(v) Quashing the impugned Notice of Demand dated 29.12.2023 bearing DIN no. ITBA/AST/S/156/2023- 24/1059175364(1) issued by Respondent no. 1 under Section 156 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure B2);

(vi) Quashing the impugned Penalty order dated 25.03.2024 bearing DIN no. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

passed by Respondent no. 1 under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2016-17 (Annexure 'C');

(vii) Quashing the impugned Computation Sheet dated 25.03.2024 passed by Respondent no. 1, bearing DIN no. ITBA/PNL/F/271(1)(b)/2023-24/1057179309(1) Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure 'C1');

(viii) Quashing the impugned Notice of Demand, dated 25.03.2024 bearing DIN no. ITBA/PNL/S/156/2023- 24/1063332285(1) passed by Respondent no. 1 under Section 156 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure 'C2');

(ix) Quashing the impugned Penalty Order dated 02.05.2024 bearing DIN no. ITBA/PNL/F/271F/2024- 25/1064570914(1) passed by Respondent no. 1 under Section 271F of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure 'D');

(x) Quashing the impugned Computation Sheet dated 02.05.2024 passed by Respondent no. 1 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/S/271F/2023-24/1059175450(1) for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure D1);

(xi) Quashing the impugned Notice of Demand dated 02.05.2024 passed by Respondent no. 1 under Section 156 of the Act, bearing DIN no. ITBA/PNL/S/156/2024-

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

25/1064567060(1) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure D2);

(xii) Quashing the impugned Approval/Sanction dated 20.03.2023 issued by Respondent no. 4, bearing DIN no. ITBA/AST/S/118/2022-23/1051012712(1) issued under Section 151 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2016-17 (Annexure 'E').

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged

in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on

record, learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to the

order of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters -

dated 28.08.2025, in order to contend that the present petition

deserves to be allowed and disposed of in terms of the said order.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents

submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is

liable to be dismissed.

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner the present petition is directly and squarely covered by

the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of

Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters -

dated 28.08.2025, the operative portion of which reads as under:

"13. I, therefore, pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The impugned show cause notices issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer outside the scope of Section 151-A of the Act stand obliterated. All further proceedings initiated thereto, challenged in these cases would stand quashed.

(ii) Liberty is reserved to the respondents - revenue to revive all these petitions in the event the Apex Court would hold in favour of the Revenue in the pending before it.

(iii) With the aforesaid liberty and to the aforesaid extent, the petitions are allowed.

(iv) Contentions of both the parties except the one noted hereinabove, shall remain open to be considered in the event revival of these petitions would become necessary."

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

6. The aforesaid order is applicable to the facts and

circumstances of the instant case and consequently, the present

petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment of

co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Ramachandra Reddy's case

(supra).

7. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The petition is allowed and disposed of in terms of the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Ramachandra Reddy Ravi Kumar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - W.P.No.17352/2022 and connected matters - dated 28.08.2025.

(ii) The impugned show cause notices and consequential orders, notices etc., at Annexure-A dated 29.03.2023, Annexure 'A1' dated 29.03.2023, Annexure 'B' dated 29.12.2023, Annexure 'B1' dated 29.12.2023, Annexure 'B2' dated 29.12.2023, Annexure 'C' dated 25.03.2024, Annexure 'C1' dated 25.03.2024, Annexure 'C2' dated 25.03.2024, Annexure 'D' dated 02.05.2025, Annexure 'D1' dated 02.05.2024, Annexure 'D2' dated 02.05.2024 and Annexure 'E' dated 20.03.2023 are hereby quashed.

NC: 2025:KHC:46302

HC-KAR

(iii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents - Revenue to seek revival of this petition, subsequent to disposal of the matters pending before the Apex Court and all rival contentions between the parties in this regard are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

JT/-

CT:JL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter