Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Anjani S/O Mallesh Naik vs Rama S/O Adappa Ghadi
2025 Latest Caselaw 5684 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 5684 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Anjani S/O Mallesh Naik vs Rama S/O Adappa Ghadi on 28 March, 2025

Author: V.Srishananda
Bench: V.Srishananda
                                                  -1-
                                                               NC: 2025:KHC-D:5722
                                                         CRL.RP No. 100114 of 2025




                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                        DHARWAD BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                               BEFORE

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

                       CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100114 OF 2025
                                  (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS))

                     BETWEEN:

                     ANJANI S/O. MALLESH NAIK,
                     AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC. SUGARCANE CUTTER,
                     R/O. BENDIGERI, SANNATANDA,
                     TQ. HARAPANAHALLI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR.
                                                                       ...PETITIONER
                     (BY SRI GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE)

                     AND:

                     RAMA S/O. ADAPPA GHADI,
                     AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST,
                     R/O. GOLEHALLI VILLAGE, TQ. HALIYAL,
                     DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581329.
                                                                     ...RESPONDENT
        Digitally    (BY SRI VITHAL K. NAYAK, ADVOCATE)
        signed by
        VN
VN      BADIGER
BADIGER Date:
        2025.03.28
        13:24:19
                           THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S. 397 R/W.
        +0530
                     401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S. 438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS), SEEKING TO ALLOW
                     THE REVISION PETITION AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
                     AND ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED I ADDL.DISTRICT AND
                     SESSIONS COURT, KARWAR (SITTING IN SIRSI) AT SIRSI IN
                     CRL.A.NO.5045/2023 DATED 02.05.2024 REMANDING THE MATTER
                     TO THE TRIAL COURT AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
                     ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL
                     JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL IN CC NO.75/2019 DATED
                     01.06.2024, FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S. 138 OF N.I. ACT.

                          THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
                     WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:5722
                                      CRL.RP No. 100114 of 2025




                         ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

Revision petitioner is in custody. Son of the revision

petitioner and respondent is present with their respective

Advocates.

Joint memo is filed, signed by the son of revision

petitioner and the respondent. Joint memo reads as

under:

"Herein, the Advocate for Revision Petitioner most respectfully submits as follows:

1. That, the Revision Petitioner has challenged the impugned judgement and order of conviction passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Haliyal in CC No. 75/2019 dated 30.01.2023 sentencing the Petitioner to pay compensation of Rs. 8,10,000/- and to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 6 months for the offence punishable under Sec. 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5722

2. The Revision Petitioner had issued the cheque bearing No. 145505 dated 01.07.2019, of Karnataka Bank Ltd of Harapanahalli Branch, for repayment of Rs. 4,00,000/- which he had availed as advance for harvesting the sugarcane crop in the land of respondent, which he was required to repay as he failed to harvest the crop and the same was presented and was dishonoured on 05.07.2019 with the endorsement "Funds Insufficient" and thereupon the respondent issued a notice and the Revision Petitioner did not make the payment of the cheque amount and thereby committed the offence punishable under Sec. 138 of N.I Act.

3. That, now the Accused and complainant have come to amicable settlement by the intervention of the elders and in view of the settlement the accused have agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 90,000/- and the Respondent have agreed to receive the same as full and final satisfaction of the dispute.

4. That, in pursuance of the settlement today the representative of the accused have paid a sum of Rs.90,000/- in cash to the complainant and the complaint has received the same.

NC: 2025:KHC-D:5722

5. It is pertinent to submit here itself that, since the accused is in judicial custody his son is before this Hon'ble Court to pay the amount to the complainant.

6. The complaint hereby agrees that, he is fully satisfied with amount received and he will not continue any kind of proceedings against the accused in respect of the present dispute.

Hence, the Joint Memo."

Placing the joint memo on record, revision petition

stands disposed of.

SD/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE

KAV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter