Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Youth Celebrity Recreation Sports vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 4923 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4923 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 March, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Youth Celebrity Recreation Sports vs The State Of Karnataka on 11 March, 2025

                                                  -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC-K:1576
                                                         WP No. 200668 of 2025




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025

                                               BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE


                           WRIT PETITION NO. 200668 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)
                      BETWEEN:

                            YOUTH CELEBRITY RECREATION SPORTS
                            MATTU CULTURALS ASSOCIATION, RAICHUR
                            BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY,
                            M.KRISHNA REDDY
                            S/O SUBA REDDY,
                            AGE: MAJOR,
                            OCC: GENERAL SECRETARY,
                            R/O: H.NO.1-3-573/33 ASHAPUR ROAD
                            OFFICERS COLONY NEAR RAJMATH TEMPAL
                            RAICHUR, TQ & DIST: RAICHUR - 584 101.
                                                                     ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI SHARANAGOWDA V.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by
BASALINGAPPA
SHIVARAJ              AND:
DHUTTARGAON
Location: HIGH        1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                   REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
                            HOME DEPARTMENT,
                            DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                            VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                            BANGALORE - 560 001.

                      2.    THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
                            RAICHUR DISTRICT, RAICHUR - 584 102.

                      3.    THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
                            RAICHUR, DIST- RAICHUR 584 102.
                                 -2-
                                             NC: 2025:KHC-K:1576
                                        WP No. 200668 of 2025




4.   THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
     RAICHUR, DIST RAICHUR - 584 102.

5.   THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
     RAICHUR RURAL POLICE STATION
     DIST: RAICHUR - 584 102.

6.   THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE
     RAICHUR, RURAL POLICE STATION,
     DIST: RAICHUR 584 102.
                                                ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI MALLIKARJUN SAHUKAR, A.G.A.)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENTS NOT TO INSIST AND NOT TO INTERFERE WITH
THE RIGHT OF THE PETITIONER ASSOCIATIONS TO PROVIDE
INDOOR       AND      OUTDOOR     RECREATIONAL       ACTIVITIES
INCLUDING PERMITTING THE MEMBERS OF THE PETITIONER
TO   PAY   13    CARD    RUMMY    AND   OTHER    RECREATIONAL
ACTIVITIES      IN   THEIR   PREMISES   AT   YOUTH    CELEBRITY
RECREATION SPORTS MATTU CULTURALS ASSOCIATION, AT
SY NO.306/3 SITUATED AT KATLAKUR TQ. RAICHUR DIST.
RAICHUR. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES ISSUED BY
THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.A. NO.200290/2015 DATED 27-06-
2016, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.


      THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
                                  -3-
                                                 NC: 2025:KHC-K:1576
                                              WP No. 200668 of 2025




                         ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)

1. Learned Government Advocate accepts notice on

behalf of respondents.

Learned Government Advocate fairly submits that the

question raised in the petition is covered in terms of

various judgments of this Court, including

W.P.No.200290/2015.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed by imposing the

conditions as under:-

(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is/are played by the members. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days' period shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so.

(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1576

police, during the raid(s) and surveillance etc.

iii) "The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played, *except games of skills.* [Incorporated vide judgment dated 27.6.2016 in W.A.No.200290/2015].

iv) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the police find that game(s) played is contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.

NC: 2025:KHC-K:1576

v) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.

vi) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner - Club / Association.

vii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.

Sd/-

(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE

CHS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter