Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4601 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2025
-1-
NC: 2025:KHC:8938-DB
ITA No. 37 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CIT)(A)
5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,
BENGALURU 560 095.
2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE -1(2)(2) PRESENT ADDRESS,
DCIT, CIRCLE -1(1)(1),
2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING,
80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA,
BENGALURU 560 095.
...APPELLANTS
Digitally signed
by SHAKAMBARI (BY SRI. Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE FOR
Location: HIGH SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
AND:
M/s. SOBHA CITY
E 106, SUNRISE CHAMBERS,
22, ULSOOR ROAD, ULSOOR,
BENGALURU 560 042,
PAN ABIFS9913P
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. CHYTHANYA K.K., SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SHARATH S., ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2025:KHC:8938-DB
ITA No. 37 of 2022
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A
OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED
22/04/2021 PASSED IN ITA NO.2936/BANG/2018, FOR THE
ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-2015 AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
Learned Senior Advocate Shri Chythanya K.K.,
appearing on behalf of Shri Sharath S., learned advocate
on record for the respondent-Assessee submits that the
subject matter of this appeal is substantially similar to the
one treated by a co-ordinate bench of this Court in
ITA No.392/2018 a/w ITA No.170/2019 (Pr.
Commissioner of Income Tax-7 and another Vs.
M/s Texport Overseas Pvt. Ltd., D.D. 12.12.2019) decided
against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee of the
kind. He further submits that by operating the rule of
parity that like cases should be treated alike, this appeal
should meet the same fate.
NC: 2025:KHC:8938-DB
2. Despite some submission being made by the
learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the Revenue,
we are not in a position to differentiate the fact matrix of
the co-ordinate case with the one at hand, even in respect
of law.
In the above circumstances, this appeal is liable to
be dismissed and accordingly it is, costs having been made
easy.
Sd/-
(KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE
Sd/-
(RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE
YN
CT:SNN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!