Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Axis Bank Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 260 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 260 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 June, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Axis Bank Ltd vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2025

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar
Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar
                                                -1-
                                                              NC: 2025:KHC:18514
                                                          CRL.P No. 6455 of 2025


                 HC-KAR



                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025

                                             BEFORE
                         THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                     CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6455 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)
                BETWEEN:
                AXIS BANK LTD.
                A BANKING COMPANY.
                CARRYING ON THE BANKING BUSINESS
                UNDER THE BANKING REGULATION ACT. 1949,
                INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT. 1956
                AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 'TRISHUL',
                3RD FLOOR, OPP SAMARTHESHWAR TEMPLE,
                LAW GARDEN, ELLIS BRIDGE,
                AHMEDABAD - 360 000.
                GUJARAT.
                AND HAVING ONE OF ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT
                GROUND FLOOR, SHOP NO.234.
                LAKE DISTRICT 74/1, NARKELDANGA MAIN ROAD.
                KOLKATA, WEST BENGAL - 700 054.
                REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH HEAD,
                MR. INDRAJIT GHOSH,
                AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by       ALSO AT
CHANDANA        S/O- AJIT GHOSH,
BM
                RAMCHANDRAPUR, SOUTH TEWNTY FOUR PARGANAS,
Location:       WEST BENGAL - 700 103.
High Court of
Karnataka                                                           ...PETITIONER
                (BY SMT. LAKSHMI T., ADVOCATE FOR
                    SRI. UNNIKRISHNAN M., ADV.)
                AND:
                1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                       BY EAST CEN CRIME
                       POLICE STATION,
                       DCP EAST DIVISION,
                       BANGALORE DISTRICT.
                       REPRESENTED BY SPP
                       HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
                       BANGALORE 01.
                                    -2-
                                                  NC: 2025:KHC:18514
                                             CRL.P No. 6455 of 2025


 HC-KAR



2.   SRI. PRADEEP B,
     S/O. B. NARASIMHA REDDY,
     AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT 20, 3RD FLOOR,
     PRAKRUTHI LAYOUT, 5TH STREET,
     HORAMAVU, AGRAHARA,
     BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 560 043.
                                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP FOR R1;
    R2 - SERVICE OF NOTICE DISPENSED WITH
    VIDE ORDER DATED 02.06.2025)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S. 482(FILED U/S.528 BNSS) CR.P.C
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.06.2024 PASSED BY THE
HON'BLE COURT OF THE XLV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU IN CR.NO.515/2024 i.e., ANNEXURE-C IN
TERMS OF WHICH THE PETITIONER IS DIRECTED TO DEFREEZE THE
SAVINGS / CURRENT ACCOUNT BEARING NO.923010072071897
MAINTAINED IN THE PETITIONERS BANK AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO
THE ACCOUNT OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR


                            ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"a) To set aside the order dated 29.06.2024 passed by the Hon'ble 45th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore, is now pending before the XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru in Crime No.515/2024 i.e., Annexure-C in terms of which, the petitioner is directed to defreeze the savings/current account bearing No.923010072071897 maintained in the Petitioner's Bank and transfer the same to the account of the Respondent No.2."

NC: 2025:KHC:18514

HC-KAR

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

AGA for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged

in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on

record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in

controversy involved in the present petition is directly and squarely

covered by the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in

the case of Axis Bank Ltd., Vs. The State of Karnataka and

Anr., and the present petition may be disposed of in the above

terms.

4. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, the issue in controversy in the present petition is covered

by the judgment of this Court in the case of Axis Bank Ltd., Vs.

The State of Karnataka and Anr., wherein it is held as under:

"The Petitioner which is a Financial Institution is before this Court challenging the order passed by 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on an application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. by the complainant/respondent No.2 directing the petitioner-Bank to defreeze the amount belonging to the accused and transfer the said amount to the bank account of the

NC: 2025:KHC:18514

HC-KAR

complainants/respondent No.2.

2. The petitioner's concern is that the order passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrate cannot be executed because it surpasses the specified release amount, and numerous courts across the Country have issued directives to the investigating agencies to unfreeze the bank accounts of the accused therein.

3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor on instructions would suggest that the matter may be remanded to the Jurisdictional Courts to consider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, by affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

4. Admittedly, multiple cases are registered against the accused herein within the State and across the country and there are multiple orders passed by the Jurisdictional Magistrates directing the petitioner to unfreeze the account of the accused and transfer the amount to the bank account of the complainants. The passing of multiple orders has caused difficulty to the petitioner/bank in executing the said order, since the amount ordered to be released in some accounts exceeds the amount available in the subject accounts of the accused. Therefore, the learned Magistrate before passing an order directing the petitioner to unfreeze and transfer the amount to the accounts of

NC: 2025:KHC:18514

HC-KAR

the complainants, is required to hear the petitioner. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Criminal Petition is allowed.

ii. The order dated 26.11.2021 passed by the 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in Cr.No.452/2021 is hereby set aside.

iii. Matter is remanded to 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

5. Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner/bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account."

5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of in

terms of the order passed in the case of Axis Bank Ltd., Vs. The

State of Karnataka and Anr.

6. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

i. Criminal Petition is allowed.

NC: 2025:KHC:18514

HC-KAR

ii. The order dated 29.06.2024 passed by the 45th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru is now pending before the XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru in Crime No.515/2024, is hereby set aside.

iii. Matter is remanded to 45th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru is now pending before the XLV Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru to reconsider the application filed under Sections 451 and 457 of Cr.P.C. afresh, after giving the opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

iv. Till the application is disposed of, the petitioner/bank is restrained from releasing the money in favour of any person from the subject account.

Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the

Petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE MDS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter