Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shri. Ravindras/O Ramachandrarao Mane vs The Government Of Karnataka
2025 Latest Caselaw 3719 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3719 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Shri. Ravindras/O Ramachandrarao Mane vs The Government Of Karnataka on 7 February, 2025

Author: M.Nagaprasanna
Bench: M.Nagaprasanna
                                              -1-
                                                           NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478
                                                        WP No. 100574 of 2025




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                      DHARWAD BENCH

                          DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025

                                           BEFORE

                          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA

                        WRIT PETITION NO. 100574 OF 2025 (GM-RES)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SHRI. RAVINDRA S/O. RAMACHANDRARAO MANE,
                   AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. CLASS-I CONTRACTOR,
                   RESIDING AT LAXMI KUNJ,
                   NEAR RAILWAY STATION,
                   BHAGWAN MAHAVEER ROAD,
                   BAGALKOT -587103.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.   THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                        PUBLIC WORKS AND INLAND
Digitally signed
by VISHAL
                        WATER TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT,
NINGAPPA                VIDHAN SOUDHA,
PATTIHAL
Location: High          AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
Court of                BENGALURU -560001,
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench           REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

                   2.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                        NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION,
                        PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
                        VISHWESHWAR NAGAR,
                        HUBLI -580032.

                   3.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
                        UPPER KRISHNA PROJECT
                        REHABILITATION DIVISION NO.2,
                        ALMATTI -586201.
                              -2-
                                         NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478
                                    WP No. 100574 of 2025




4.   THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
     PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,
     NAVANAGAR,
     BAGALKOT -587103.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA)

       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO, ISSUE A
WRIT     OF   CERTIORARI     QUASHING      THE     IMPUGNED
ENDORSEMENT       DATED     17/12/2024    ADDRESSED         BY
RESPONDENT      NO.2      BEARING   NO.ENH/HBL/AB-1/CRF-
1800/2024-25/1988 VIDE ANNEXURE-H. ISSUE A WRIT OF
MANDAMUS      DIRECTING   RESPONDENTS     TO    PAY   TO   THE
PETITIONER THE APPLICABLE BALANCE GST AMOUNT PAYABLE
BY RESPONDENTS AS DETAILED BY THE PETITIONER IN
REPRESENTATIONS DATED 05/11/2019 AND 11/11/2024 VIDE
ANNEXURE-B, C, D, E, F AND G ALONG WITH THE ACCRUED
INTEREST THEREON AT THE RATE OF 18 PERCENT PER ANNUM
FROM THE DATE OF PAYMENT OF THE GST AMOUNT BY THE
PETITIONER TILL THE DATE OF ACTUAL REALISATION OF THE
SAME BY RESPONDENTS. PASS ANY OTHER ORDER(S) AS THIS
HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.


       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
                                           -3-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478
                                                       WP No. 100574 of 2025




                                  ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the

following prayer:

"i. To issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned endorsement dated 17/12/2024 addressed by respondent No.2 bearing No.ENH/HBL/AB-1/CRF- 1800/2024-25/1988 vide Annexure-H.

ii. To issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay to the petitioner the applicable balance GST amount payable by respondents as detailed by the petitioner in representations dated 05/11/2019 and 11/11/2024 vide Annexure-B, C, D, E, F and G along with the accrued interest thereon at the rate of 18 percent per annum from the date of payment of the GST amount by the petitioner till the date of actual realisation of the same by respondents.

iii. Pass any other orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice and equity."

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

and the respondent-State admits that the issue in the lis

stands covered by the judgment rendered by the

Coordinate Bench in Writ Petition No.9721/2019 and

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478

connected matters, disposed on 11.04.2023, wherein the

Coordinate Bench has held as follows:

"(i) Petitions are hereby disposed of.

(ii) The Respondents-State and other Govt agencies / Respondents who have entered into works contract with the Petitioners are issued the following directions / guidelines:-

(a) Calculate the works executed pre-GST (prior to 01.07.2017) under KVAT regime and payments received by the Petitioners.

(b) The payments received by the Petitioners pre-GST for such of the works executed before 01.07.2017 are to be assessed under KVAT tax regime - either under COT or VAT scheme as applicable.

(c) Calculate the balance works to be completed or completed after 01.07.2017, in the original contract.

(d) Derive the rate of materials, KVAT items required or used to complete the balance works.

(e) Deduct the "KVAT" amount from those materials and the service tax, if applicable. (f) Add the applicable "GST" on those items.

(g) Input Credit on the materials is to be arrived at and be set off as against the output GST, for those assessed under regular VAT.

(h) Further, the "tax difference" should be calculated on such balance works executed or to be executed after 01.07.2017 separately.

(i) Based on the result obtained on calculation of the tax difference on the contract value, concerned department/authority has to

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478

decide whether agreement needs to be changed or not.

(j) A supplementary agreement may be signed with the Petitioners for the revised GST-

inclusive work value for the Balance Work completed or to be completed as determined above and in case the revised GST-inclusive work value for the Balance Work, completed or to be completed after 01.07.2017, is more than the original agreement work value, the Petitioners are to be paid /reimbursed, as the case may be, the differential tax amount by the concerned employer; so also, in case payments for works completed pre-GST are made postGST, the concerned employer has to pay or reimburse, as the case may be, the differential tax amount, to the Petitioners.

(iii) Petitioners are directed to submit comprehensive representations to the respective employers/Respondents within a period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, irrespective of whether they have completed the works pre-GST or post-GST or payments were received or yet to be received post-GST.

(iv) If such representations are submitted, the respective employers/Respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the same in the light of the aforesaid directions / guidelines as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of 8 weeks from the date of submission of the representations.

(v) In view of the interim orders passed by this Court in the present petitions, such of the petitioners who had not filed their GST returns during the period after 01.07.2017 are permitted to file their returns / amended returns, pursuant to the calculation of the differential tax as per procedure above under GST regime, without insisting on interest or penalty or limitation.

(vi) The GST authorities are also directed not to take precipitative action against the Petitioners for a

NC: 2025:KHC-D:2478

period of 6 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

(vii) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioners to challenge any order / decision passed / taken by the respondents or the authorities, subsequent to this order and also take recourse to such remedies as available in law."

3. Another Coordinate Bench follows the said

judgment and disposes the petition. Therefore, the petition

deserves to succeed with the same relief and the same

directions as is rendered by the Coordinate Bench (supra).

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

KGK

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter