Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Vijaykumar vs Sri Mutturaj
2025 Latest Caselaw 3245 Kant

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3245 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 August, 2025

Karnataka High Court

Sri Vijaykumar vs Sri Mutturaj on 7 August, 2025

Author: Jyoti Mulimani
Bench: Jyoti Mulimani
                                                -1-
                                                             NC: 2025:KHC-K:4505
                                                       WP No. 202377 of 2025


                      HC-KAR




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                         KALABURAGI BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025

                                              BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
                             WRIT PETITION NO.202377 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
                      BETWEEN:

                      SRI. VIJAYKUMAR S/O. SOMSINGH NAYAK,
                      AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: DOCTOR,
                      R/O. MUDDEBIHAL,
                      DIST. VIJAYPUR-586101.

                                                                   ...PETITIONER

                      (BY SRI. SHARANABASAVESHWAR MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.   SRI. MUTTURAJ
                           S/O. VITHAL BANDIWADDAR,
                           AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
Digitally signed by        R/O. SAWALAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI,
THEJAS KUMAR N             DIST. BAGALKOT-587101.
Location: HIGH             (PETITONER-1 IN FDP NO.5/2015)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                      2.   SMT. RAJASHREE W/O. BALARAM SHILPI,
                           AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
                           R/O. SAWALAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI,
                           DIST. BAGALKOT-587101.

                      3.   SRI. SIDDUBA
                           S/O VITHAL BANDIWADDAR,
                           AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                           R/O. SAWALAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI,
                           DIST. BAGALKOT-587101
                           -2-
                                    NC: 2025:KHC-K:4505
                                 WP No. 202377 of 2025


HC-KAR




4.   SMT. BHAGYASHREE
     W/O. ANIL CHAVAN,
     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
     R/O. SAWALAGI, TQ. JAMAKHANDI,
     DIST. BAGALKOT-587101.

5.   SRI. YAMANAPPA
     S/O. YALLAPPA HADAGALI,
     AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC: PENSIONER,
     R/O. SADASHIV NAGAR, BLDE ROAD,
     VIJAYPUR-586101.

6.   SRI. ANILKUMAR
     S/O. YAMANAPPA HADALGERI,
     AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
     R/O SADASHIV NAGAR, BLDE ROAD,
     VIJAYPUR-586101.

7.   HULIGEWWA
     D/O. MUTTANNA WADDAR,
     W/O TIMMANNA GEJJENAL,
     AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
     R/O. SAMBALAPUR, TQ. CHILLANUR,
     DIST. RAICHUR-584101.

8.   SMT. SRIMANTEWWA
     W/O. BASAVARAJ WADDAR,
     AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
     R/O. NETAJI GALLI, MUDDEBIHAL,
     DIST. VIJAYPUR-586101.

9.   SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR @ SHEKHARAPPA,
     S/O. ANNAPPA WADDAR,
     AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
     R/O NETAJI GALLI, MUDDEBIHAL,
     DIST. VIJAYPUR-586101.

                                        ...RESPONDENTS

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
                                       -3-
                                                          NC: 2025:KHC-K:4505
                                                     WP No. 202377 of 2025


HC-KAR




      THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
                               ORAL ORDER

Sri.Sharanabasaveshwar Mamadapur., counsel for the

petitioner has appeared in person.

2. The order dated 03.06.2025 passed by the Court of

Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Muddebihal on I.A.No.III in FDP

No.5/2015 vide Annexure-G is called into question in this Writ

Petition on several grounds as setout in the Memorandum of

Writ Petition.

3. Counsel for the petitioner urged several

contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers

with care.

4. The short point that requires consideration is

whether the order passed by the Trial Court requires

interference.

5. Suffice it to note that a suit was filed in

O.S.No.92/2003 for partition and separate possession. The Trial

Court vide Judgment dated 13.12.2005 decreed the suit in part.

The FDP proceedings were initiated and in the said proceedings,

NC: 2025:KHC-K:4505

HC-KAR

the petitioner moved an application to implead himself as

respondent to the proceedings. It is significant to note that the

petitioner had filed a suit for specific performance and the same

has been decreed and he is agitating his remedies before the

Executing Court. Therefore, his presence in the FDP

proceedings is not required. The Trial Court extenso referred to

the material on record and rightly dismissed the application. I

find no grounds to interfere with the same. The Writ Petition is

devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, the

Writ Petition is dismissed at the stage of preliminary hearing.

Sd/-

(JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/VNR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter