Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 22374 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 September, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:35965-DB
WP No. 23504 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
WRIT PETITION NO. 23504 OF 2024 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
SRI. NANDISHA L.M.
S/O MALLESHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
WORKING AS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
PANDAVAPURA SUB DIVISION
MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434
RESIDING AT
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER QUARTERS
PANDAVAPURA TOWN
MANDYA DISTRICT-571 434
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.S. BHAGWAT, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR
SRI. SATISH K., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by
CHANNEGOWDA AND:
PREMA
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS
REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA FOR RESPONDENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:35965-DB
WP No. 23504 of 2024
(a) CALL FOR RECORDS FROM THE KARNATAKA STATE
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN RESPECT OF THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.08.2024 PASSED IN
APPLICATION No.4124/2024 (ANNEXURE-A), (b) SET ASIDE
THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.08.2024 PASSED BY THE
KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN
APPLICATION No.4124/2024, IN SO FAR AS NON GRANT OF
EX-PARTE INTERIM ORDER OF STAY AS SOUGHT FOR BY THE
PETITIONER IS CONCERNED (ANNEXURE-A) AND
CONSEQUENTLY GRANT INTERIM AS PRAYED FOR BY THE
PETITIONER IN APPLICATION No.4124/2024, IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGEMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN
AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
and
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:35965-DB
WP No. 23504 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner in this writ petition.
2. The writ petition is filed against the non-grant of
the interim order by the Tribunal which is said to cause
prejudice the petitioner.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing
for the respondent points out that the matter stands posted to
23.09.2024 for reply and all that has been rejected by the
Tribunal is the grant of an ex-parte interim order as sought for.
4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits
that the issue requires a proper consideration and that if the
interim order is not granted, the post held by the petitioner is
likely to be filled up.
5. Having considered the contentions advanced and in
view of the fact that the matter stands posted before the
Tribunal on 23.09.2024, we are of the opinion that the question
NC: 2024:KHC:35965-DB
of grant of interim order is to be considered by the Tribunal on
23.09.2024. The official respondent shall take steps to see that
reply, if any is on record by then. Reserving liberty to the
petitioner to seek an interim order before the Tribunal on
23.09.2024, even in the absence of the reply by the
Government, the writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/-
(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
RAK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!