Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25968 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42691
CRL.RP No. 241 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 241 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. M/S ANJANEYA CONCRETE BLOCKS,
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ADDRESS AT
BINGIPURA VILLAGE,
BETTADASAPURA POST,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT,
REP BY PARTNER SRI DANANJAY.
2. SRI. DANANJAY, PARTNER
M/S ANJANEYA CONCRETE BLOCKS,
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
HAVING ADDRESS AT
BINGIPURA VILLAGE,
BETTADASAPURA POST,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
Digitally BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT
signed by
MALATESH AND HAVING RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
KC AT NO. 27, "SRI RANGA" 1ST MAIN ROAD,
Location: BRINDAVANA LAYOUT,
HIGH ARKERE POST,
COURT OF BANGALORE - 560 076.
KARNATAKA ...PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SARITHA A L., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. S SHANKARACHAR., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. H. S. PUTTASWAMY,
S/O SATHE GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42691
CRL.RP No. 241 of 2022
RA/T NO.1137, 35TH C CROSS,
26TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH T BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 041.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JAGANATH K M.,ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION
DATED 09.03.2017 IN C.C.NO.16897/2015 ON THE FILE OF XVI
ACMM, WHICH IS CONFIRMED BY THE JUDGMENT DATED
14.01.2020 IN CRL.A.NO.467/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE LI
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
BY THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.01.2020 IN CRL.A.NO.467/2017
ON THE FILE OF LI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY (CCH-52) AND C/c OF LVIII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
CITY (CCH-59) PETITIONER BE ACQUITTED OF THE CHARGES
AND THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION BE ALLOWED AS
PRAYED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Memo is filed by the learned counsel for the revision
petitioners reporting the death of second revision
petitioner, who was representing the first revision
petitioner/partnership firm.
2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioners also
submit that the firm was dissolved in the year 2015 itself,
NC: 2024:KHC:42691
and in the absence of other partners being made as
parties to the proceedings, the present petition is
dismissed as abated.
3. Sri. K. M. Jaganath, learned counsel submits
that he is unable to get the details of the partners who
would represent the first revision petitioner.
4. Accordingly, placing the submission of counsels
for the parties on record, the revision petition is
dismissed as abated. Amount in deposit if any is
ordered to be withdrawn by complainant if not already
withdrawn.
Sd/-
(V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
AMA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!