Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25800 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43857-DB
CCC No. 751 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 751 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQ
S/O M. AKBAR
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
R/AT 4/2, 8TH CROSS
MANORAYANA PALYA
SULTHAN PALYA
BANGALORE-560 032.
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED TAHIR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by
HARIKRISHNA V
Location: HIGH 1. DR.BHEEMASHANKAR S GULED, IPS
COURT OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
KARNATAKA
BANGALORE CITY POLICE
EAST DIVISION,
ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008
2. PRAKASH.R
STATION HOUSE OFFICER
D J HALLI PS, BANGALORE CITY POLICE
BANGALORE - 560 001.
...ACCUSED
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
SECRETARY TO GOVT.
HOME DEPARTMENT
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43857-DB
CCC No. 751 of 2022
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALORE-560 001.
...PRO-FORMA RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. DEVARAJ C.H, GOV.ADVOCATE)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, PRAYING TO INITIATE
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ALLEGED ACCUSED
NO.1 AND 2, MORE PARTICULARLY ACCUSED NO.1 FOR
WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY DISOBEYING THE JUDGMENT
DATED 21.09.2021 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT PASSED IN THE
W.P.NO.17115/2021 AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)
This contempt proceeding is initiated under Sections
11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article
215 of the Constitution of India for willful disobedience of
the order passed by the learned Single Judge on the writ
side in W.P.Nos.17115/2021 dated 21.09.2021 as per
Annexure-A.
2. Learned counsel, namely, Sri Mohammed
Taher, for the complainant is present before the Court
NC: 2024:KHC:43857-DB
physically. Similarly, learned Government Advocate,
Sri Devaraj C.H., for respondents/accused.
3. Learned Government Advocate for the
respondents/accused has filed detailed affidavit along with
Annexures in compliance of the order passed by the
learned Single Judge in the aforesaid writ petition.
4. However, keeping in view the submission made
by the learned Government Advocate for the
respondents/accused so also having gone through the
contents of the compliance affidavit, it is deemed
appropriate to state that there is no consequence to
persuade the contempt petition in further. Consequently,
the contempt proceeding is hereby dropped.
Sd/-
(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE
Sd/-
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE
KTY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!