Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Nagaraja T K vs State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 25660 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25660 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Nagaraja T K vs State Of Karnataka on 29 October, 2024

                                         -1-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC:43568-DB
                                                  WP No. 20947 of 2024




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

                                      PRESENT
                    THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                         AND
                       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
                     WRIT PETITION NO. 20947 OF 2024 (GM-RES-PIL)
              BETWEEN:

              1.   SRI NAGARAJA T K.,
                   S/O LATE T S KRISHNEGOWDA,
                   AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
                   R/AT THRUNASI VILLAGE,
                   MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
                   KOLAR DISTRICT-563139

              2.   SRI SANTHOSH KUMAR T M
                   S/O MUNIYAPPA,
                   AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
                   R/AT THRUNASI VILLAGE,
                   MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
                   KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
Digitally
signed by     3.   SRI SRINIVASA T N
PRABHAKAR          S/O NANJEGOWDA,
SWETHA             AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
KRISHNAN
                   R/AT THRUNASI VILLAGE,
Location:          MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
High Court of      KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
Karnataka
              4.   SRI MUNIYAPPA T
                   S/O THIMMARAYAPPA,
                   AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
                   R/AT THRUNASI VILLAGE,
                   MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
                   KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
                                                        ...PETITIONERS
              (BY SRI KIRAN. B, ADVOCATE)
                            -2-
                                   NC: 2024:KHC:43568-DB
                                   WP No. 20947 of 2024




AND:

1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
     REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
     M.S.BUILDING,
     BENGALURU-560001

2.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     KOLAR DISTRICT,
     KOLAR-563101

3.   THE TAHSILDAR
     MALUR TALUK,
     MALUR-563139

4.   THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
     THRUNASI GRAMA PANCHAYATH,
     THRUNASI VILLAGE,
     MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK,
     KOLAR DISTRICT-563139
                                       ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)

      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH RULE
14(1) OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA-PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION RULES,
2018 PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING
THE RESPONDENT NoS.2 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS AND REMOVE
THE ENCROACHERS FROM THE WATER CANAL CUM KALUVE
LAND BEARING Sy No.120, MEASURING 10 GUNTAS
SITUATED AT THRUNASI VILLAGE, MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR
TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF MASTHI
POLICE AS PER THE ANNEXURE-A AND B.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN
AS UNDER:
                                 -3-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:43568-DB
                                             WP No. 20947 of 2024




CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
       N. V. ANJARIA
       and
       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND


                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Heard learned advocate Mr. B. Kiran for the petitioners

and learned Additional Government Advocate Smt. Niloufer

Akbar for respondent Nos.1 to 3, who appeared upon service of

copy of the petition in advance.

2. The present is a petition styled as public interest petition.

The four petitioners claimed that they are the permanent

residents of Thrunasi Village, Masthi Hobli, Malur Taluka and

that they are public spirited persons. The prayer advanced in

this public interest petition is as under,

"to direct respondent Nos.2 to 4 to consider the representations of the petitioners and remove the encroachers from the Water Canal cum Raja Kaluve land bearing Sy.No.120 measuring 10 Gunats situated at Thrunasi Village, Masthi Hobli, Malur Taluka, Kolar District with the assistance of Masthi Police."

3. The case of the petitioners could be gathered in nutshell

from the averments made in paragraph 11 of the petition,

extracted herein,

NC: 2024:KHC:43568-DB

"...the neighbouring land lords have encroached the Water Canal cum Raja Kaluve land illegally in the village of the petitioners, due to said illegal encroachment of the Water Canal there is no space to passing the rain water and excess of Lake water, when the Villagers have questioned about the illegal encroachment by neighbouring land lords about said encroachment and installation of borewell and transformer in the Water Canal cum Raja Kaluve land, the neighbouring land lords defended and avoid to evict from the water canal cum Raja Kaluve, therefore they are not ready to leave the illegal encroachment. Thereafter wards the petitioner No.1 has approached the concern authority and given requisition regarding illegal encroachment of water canal cum Raja Kaluve, inspite of receiving the requisition from the petitioners, the respondent No.3 have raised the complaint in NCR/CR/142/2021-22 and they have visited to the spot conducted spot mahazer and hand over the said encroachment land bearing Sy No.120, measuring 10 Guntas to respondent No.4 on 02.02.2024, in spite of hand overring the encroachment land to the respondent No.4, the neighbouring land lords have again encroached said land illegally, thereafter the petitioners have informed to respondent No.4, even after informing the above said illegal encroachment, they have not taken any action against the said encroachers."

4. The grievance raised is that respondent No.4-the

Panchayath Development Officer, Thrunasi Grama Panchayath,

Thrunasi Village, Masthi Hobli, has failed to take action against

the neighbouring landlords despite receipt of the representation

dated 05.02.2024. The petitioners want that the encroachment

from Raja Kaluve land bearing Survey No. 120 measuring 10

Guntas situated at Thrunasi Village is required to be removed in

light of the representation dated 05.02.2024.

NC: 2024:KHC:43568-DB

5. The subject matter is in the domain of the respondent-

authorities to be looked into by considering the representation

of the petitioners which is stated to have been made and has

remained undecided.

6. In the totality of the facts and circumstances, the present

public interest petition could be entertained only to the extent

by directing respondent Nos.2 to 4 to act through their

competent authority to consider the representation made by

the petitioners regarding encroachment, arrive at factual

finding after necessary inquiry etc., and take appropriate

decision/action if required in accordance with law preferably

within twelve weeks from today.

7. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the

present petition is disposed of as not entertained.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

KPS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter