Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25632 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:15762-DB
RP No. 100098 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
REVIEW PETITION NO. 100098 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. KHUTEJABI ABDUL LATIF SHAIKH,
AGE. 74 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK.
2. SMT. HASEENABI
W/O. IMTIYAZ AHMED SHAIKH
AGE. 45 YEARS,
OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK.
3. MANTESHA IMTIYAZ AHMED SHAIKH,
Digitally signed
AGE. 11 YEARS, SINCE MINOR
by JAGADISH T
R R/BY. NATURAL MOTHER
Location: High
Court of PETITIONER NO.2 SMT. HASEENABI
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench W/O. IMTIYAZ SHAIKH
AS A MINOR GUARDIAN,
ALL RE R/O. BRUWADA, TQ. ANKOLA,
DIST. KARWAR (U.K) -581314.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MOHD RAFEEK, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE DIVISION CONTROLLER,
N.W.K.R.T.C, HAVERI,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:15762-DB
RP No. 100098 of 2022
HAVERI DIVISION,
R/BY CHIEF LAW OFFICER,
N.W.K.R.T.C. CENTRAL OFFICE,
HUBBALLI-580030.
2. BASAVARAJ
S/O. FAKKIRAPPA MUGALIYAVAR,
AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. DRIVER,
R/O. N.W.K.R.T.C, HAVERI DIVISION,
HAVERI-581110.
3. B. G. MANAGEMENT,
C/O. CLASSIC PHOTO STUDIO,
HINDU HIGH SCHOOL COMPLEX,
KARWAR-581301.
4. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
BRANCH OFFICE 1628, KAIKINI ROAD,
KARWAR-581301.
...RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO R1 & R4 SERVED;
NOTICE TO R3-REFUSED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED U/S. 114 READ WITH
ORDER XLVII RULE (1) OF CPC, PRAYING TO MODIFY/REVIEW THE
COMMON JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HON'BLE DIVISION BENCH OF
THIS HON'BLE COURT IN MFA NO. 21929/2013 BY ALLOWING THIS
REVIEW PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND
ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER
WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:15762-DB
RP No. 100098 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD)
This Court by order dated 19.09.2023 issued notice to
the respondents and two weeks' time was granted to comply
with the office objections.
Even today, when the matter is called in the morning
session none appears for the review petitioner. Hence, it is
passed over. Even called in the afternoon session, none
appears for the review petitioner, and even office objections
are not complied and process fee is also not paid. It
appears that review petitioner is not interested in
prosecuting this petition.
Hence, petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
(H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
Sd/-
(VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
SMM/ct-an
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!