Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25627 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43426-DB
RFA No. 425 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 425 OF 2022 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GAYATHRAMMA
W/O H.R NARAYAN
SINCE DEAD BY LRS
1. SMT. H N ROOPA
W/O MAHALINGEGOWDA
D/O LATE GAYATHRAMMA
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
2. SMT. H.N. REKHA
W/O VENKATACHALA
Digitally signed by D/O LATE GAYATHRAMMA
HARIKRISHNA V AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 3. SRI. H.N CHETAN
KARNATAKA
S/O H.R NARAYAN
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
4. SMT. KAMAKSHI
W/O SIDDEGOWDA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT HOMMARAGALLI VILLAGE
MANANDAVADI MAIN ROAD
HAMPAPURA HOBLI, H.D KOTE TALUK-571 125.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SUNIL K.N, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43426-DB
RFA No. 425 of 2022
AND:
1. SRI. P.T RAMACHANDRAIAH @ SWAMY
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
2. SRI P.T SRINIVASA
S/O LATE THIMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
BOTH ARE R/AT PARASAIAHNA HUNDI
SRIRAMPURA POST, KASABA HOBLI
MYSURU DISTRICT-570 001.
3. SMT. ALMELLAMMA
W/O SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
R/AT NO.1664
BESIDES SEETHARANGA HOSPITAL
BEHIND MAHADESHWARA TEMPLE
MYSURU-570 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAN B.K, ADVOCATE FOR R1 - ABSENT
SRI. P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 - ABSENT
SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R. GOULAY, ADVOCATE FOR
R3 - ABSENT )
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC. 1908
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2021 PASSED ON I.A.
NO.IV IN OS.No. 281/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUGE, AND CJM, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE
I.A.NO.IV FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF
CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:43426-DB
RFA No. 425 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR)
There is no representation for the parties.
Office noting reveals as 'Dismissal of the appeal for non
filing of paper book vide order dated 24.09.2024'.
Keeping in view the office noting, it is deemed
appropriate to state that this appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(K.SOMASHEKAR) JUDGE
Sd/-
(RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE HKV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!