Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25624 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:43397
RFA No. 1878 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1878 OF 2013 (RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SAMIULLA,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
S/O LATE ABDUL KHADAR,
NO. 57 AND 58,
NEW WAHEB HOTEL,
O.K ROAD, RAGIPET,
BANGALORE 02
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S.G. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. K. SAJIDA KHATOON
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M W/O LATE S.M. AYUB.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 2. SMT. A. SHAGUFTA NAGREEN,
KARNATAKA
D/O LATE S.M. AYUB,
W/O SHRI. MOHAMMED ASGAR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
3. SMT. A. ZOHRA JABEEN
D/O LATE S.M. AYUB,
W/O SHRI. T. MOHAMMED NASIR,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.20/1,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:43397
RFA No. 1878 of 2013
KEMP ROAD, COLES PARK,
BANGALORE 05.
4. SRI. FAYAZULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
S/O A. AZEEZULLA KHAN,
NO.61, OLD KASAI ROAD,
RAGIPET,
BANGALORE 02.
5. SRI A. AZEEZULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
S/O LATE R. AHMED KHAN,
R/AT. NO.11, KARPOORA ADAMSAB LANE,
NAGARATHPET,
BANGALORE 02
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S.N. SAMEER AND
SRI. M.K. NIYAZUDDIN, ADVOCATES FOR R1 TO R3;
R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/ORDER 41 RULE 1 R/W SEC 96 OF
CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED
28.2.2013 PASSED IN Ex.1684/2012 ON THE FILE OF XI
ADDITIONAL JUDGE, MACT, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE
APPLICATION FILED U/ORDER 21 RULE 97 R/W SEC 151 OF
CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:43397
RFA No. 1878 of 2013
ORAL JUDGMENT
Appellant's counsel has not taken steps in respect of
the sole appellant and in spite of the court order dated
23.01.2020 and so also on 20.02.2020, wherein it was
ordered that if compliance is not effected before the closure
of office hours on that day, appeals shall sand dismissed for
non-prosecution. Matter was listed on 28.02.2020. On that
day, counsel made submission that steps have been taken.
Hence, office was directed to verify and issue notice to
respondent no.4 (a) to (f) and later, when the matter was
listed on 28.06.2021, no representation was made by
appellant's counsel. Further, matter was listed on
20.01.2023, wherein two weeks time was granted on that
day.
2. Having perused the order sheet, it is noticed that steps
have not been taken to bring the LRs of respondent no.4
from 2020 and hence, the appeal is dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE rs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!