Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Uma Stores vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 25362 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25362 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S Uma Stores vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 October, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:42849-DB
                                                        WP No. 13934 of 2024




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                           DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

                                              PRESENT
                          THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE
                                                AND
                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
                           WRIT PETITION NO. 13934 OF 2024 (GM-MM-S)
                   BETWEEN:


                        M/S. UMA STONES
                        SY. NO.65
                        BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE
                        KORA POST,
                        TUMKUR - 572 128,
                        REP. BY ITS PARTNER
                        SRI VIJAY KUMAR

Digitally signed
                        S/O. NANDALAL SHARMA.
by VALLI
MARIMUTHU                                                       ...PETITIONER
Location: High
Court of           (BY SRI MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE)
Karnataka
                   AND:


                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                        DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
                        M. S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
                        BANGALORE - 560 001.
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC:42849-DB
                                          WP No. 13934 of 2024




2.    DEPUTY DIRECTOR
      DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
      KHANIJA BHAVAN,
      SPOORTHI LAYOUT BADDIHALLI,
      RING ROAD, TUMKURU - 572 104.
                                               ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA)


       THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR
THE    RECORDS      FROM    THE     2ND   RESPONDENT    IN   No.
GABUE/UNITHU/KAGAGU/NOTICE/2023-24          AND   ALLOW      THE
WRIT PETITION AND ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF
CERTIORARI       QUASHING    ANNEXURE-A        NOTICE   DATED
13.03.2024    ISSUED   BY   THE     2ND   RESPONDENT    IN   No.
GABUE/UNITHU/KAGAGU/NOTICE/2023-24 AND ETC,.

       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:



CORAM:       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
             N. V. ANJARIA
             and
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND
                                   -3-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC:42849-DB
                                             WP No. 13934 of 2024




                           ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Annappa for learned advocate

Mr. Manjunath G. Kandekar for the petitioner and learned

Additional Government Advocate Smt. Niloufer Akbar for the

respondents who appeared upon service of copy of this petition in

advance.

2. What is sought to be called in question in this petition filed

under Article 226 of the Constitution, is notice dated 13.03.2023,

whereby respondent No.2-the Deputy Director, Department of

Mines and Geology, Tumkuru has required the petitioner-industry

to seek and get registration under Rule 15-B of the Karnataka

Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

3. The notice is indicative that it is a notice issued under Rule

15-B of the aforesaid Rules as amended in 2023. It requires the

petitioner-industry to get registered within the period of 90 days and

pay the registration fees to further state that the failure would entail

the levy of fine.

NC: 2024:KHC:42849-DB

4. Learned advocate for the petitioner would submit that the

petitioner is a small and micro scale industry which would not fall

within the purview of aforesaid Rule and therefore, shall not be

liable to be registered. Be that as it may. It is for the competent

authority to examine the merits.

4.1. Learned Additional Government Advocate would submit that

M/s. Shanthala Marbles and Granites Vs. The State of

Karnataka and another which is Writ Petition No.14024 of 2024,

similar fact situation was posed before the Court, wherein similar

notice was under challenge and the Court relegated the petitioner

to the authorities permitting the petitioner to file reply.

5. Since the controversy is only at the notice stage and the

petition is filed at such stage, the petitioner is at liberty to respond

to the notice.

5.1 The competent authority shall decide about the registration of

the petitioner-industry strictly in accordance with law as per the

Rules and after taking into account the stand of the petitioner.

6. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of

the case of the either side and has not gone into the merits. The

NC: 2024:KHC:42849-DB

petition is not entertained accordingly as it is pre-mature relegating

the petitioner as above and requiring the authorities to take

decision and to complete the entire exercise within two months

from today.

7. The writ petition stands dismissed subject to above.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

DDU

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter