Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25242 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42512
RFA No. 1067 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1067 OF 2008 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI CHINNA REDDY
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LR
1(a) SMT. DHANALAKSHMI
D/O LATE CHINNA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT NO.222, HANUMAPPA ROAD
BEHIND SRIRAMA TEMPLE
NEW THIPPASANDRA
BENGALURU-560075.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. P.N. NANJA REDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M 1. SRI PRAKASH REDDY
Location: HIGH S/O LATE SRI.PAPAIAH REDDY
COURT OF AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
KARNATAKA
2. SRI SRINIVASA REDDY
S/O LATE SRI.PAPAIAH REDDY
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
CHANNEL MAIN ROAD,
SHAMANNA LAYOUT, ULSOOR,
BENGALURU-560 008.
3. SMT. LALITHAMMA
W/O SHAMANNA REDDY,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42512
RFA No. 1067 of 2008
R/AT KAGGADASAPURA
C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST,
BENGALURU-560 093.
4. SMT. GAJALAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE K.G.SRINIVASA REDDY
R/AT KAGGADASAPURA
C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST
BENGALURU-560 093.
(VIDE ORDER DATED 27.02.2012, R4 IS DELETED)
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.A. SRIKANTE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R2;
SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
VIDE ORDER DATED 27.02.2012, R4 IS DELETED)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.05.2008 PASSED IN
OS.NO.5853/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDL.CITY CIVIL
JUDGE, BANGALORE, CCH-28, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
DECLAATION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
ORAL JUDGMENT
This Court, having noticed non-appearance of the
appellant and also not carrying out the amendment, granted a
week's time to amend the cause title to bring the legal
representatives of deceased sole appellant on record as per
order dated 14.10.2024 and also made it clear that, if the
learned counsel fails to amend the cause title and make the
NC: 2024:KHC:42512
payment as ordered, the appeal will be dismissed. Inspite of
the said order, learned counsel for the appellant has neither
paid the cost nor amended the cause title in bringing the legal
representatives of deceased sole appellant on record.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-amendment of
cause title and non-payment of cost.
In view of non-compliance of order dated 03.10.2023,
I.A.Nos.1/2023 to 3/2023 are also dismissed, since cost is not
paid.
Sd/-
(H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!