Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 25235 Kant
Judgement Date : 22 October, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:42521
RSA No. 939 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 939 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. K GOVINDASHETTY
DEAD BY LR'S
1(A). PUTTAVENKATAMMA,
W/O LATE K. GOVINDASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT THOGATARA BEEDI,
SARGIRU VILLAGE, H.D. KOTE TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 001.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. PUTTAVENKATAMMA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed 1. KRISHNASHETTY,
by ANUSHA V
DEAD BY LRS,
Location: High
Court Of
Karnataka 1(A). RANGAMMA,
W/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
1(B). SUMITHRA,
D/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
1(C). DRAKSHAYAINI,
W/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:42521
RSA No. 939 of 2014
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT THOGATARA BEEDI,
SARGURU VILLAGE, H.D. KOTE TALUK,
MYSORE DISTRICT - 570 001.
1(D). RADHKRISHNA,
S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R1(A), (B) AND (D) ALL ARE
RESIDING AT C/O RATHAMMA,
W/O KUMBAIAH, KUMBARARA COLONY,
BASAVANAGUDI ROAD, K.R. PETE TOWN,
MANDYA DISTRICT - 570 001.
2. GOVINDASHETTY,
S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
3. RADHAKRISHNA,
S/O LATE KRISHNASHETTY,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NO.2 AND 3 ARE
R/AT THOGATARA BEEDI,
SARGURU VILLEGE, H.D. KOTE TALUK,
MYOSRE DISTRICT - 570 001.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W
SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 12.03.2014 PASSED IN R.A.NO.52/1999 ON THE FILE
OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, HUNSUR DISMISSING THE
APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 24.06.1999 PASSED IN O.S.NO.146/1992 ON THE FILE
C.J (JR.DN) AND J.M.F.C., H.D.KOTE.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:42521
RSA No. 939 of 2014
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
As per report received from Senior Civil Judge and
J.M.F.C., H.D.Kote, dated 07.08.2024, Court notice was issued
to appellant, after death of learned counsel for appellant.
Notice was duly served on appellant on 03.08.2024. Till
date, necessary arrangements are not made. This would
indicate that appellant is not interested in duly prosecuting
appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
PHM
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!