Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S. Naveen Granites vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 24924 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 24924 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2024

Karnataka High Court

M/S. Naveen Granites vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 October, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:41765-DB
                                                         WP No. 13451 of 2024




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024

                                             PRESENT

                           THE HON'BLE MR. N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE

                                               AND

                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

                             WRIT PETITION No. 13451 OF 2024 (GM-MM_S)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   M/S. NAVEEN GRANITES,
                        PLAT No. 127, 2ND PHASE,
                        KIADB, ANTHARASANAHALLI INDUSTRIAL AREA,
                        TUMAKURU-572106.
                        REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER,
                        SRI. NAGARAJ. D. V.,
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI MANJUNATH G. KANDEKAR, ADVOCATE)
                   AND:

                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed        DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY,
by VALLI
MARIMUTHU               M.S. BUILDING,
Location: High          AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
Court of                BANGALORE-560 001.
Karnataka

                   2.   THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
                        DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY,
                        KHANIJA BHAVAN,
                        SPOORTHI LAYOUT,
                        BADDIHALLI, RING ROAD,
                        TUMAKURU-572 104.
                                                               ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA)
                                 -2-
                                           NC: 2024:KHC:41765-DB
                                           WP No. 13451 of 2024




      THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING
ANNEXURE-A NOTICE DATED 24/08/2023 ISSUED BY THE 2ND
RESPONDENT      IN    No.GABUE/UNITHU/KAGAGU/NOTICE/2023-
24/2256.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:       HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE
             N. V. ANJARIA
             and
             HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND

                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Manjunath G. Kandekar for the

petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate

Smt.Niloufer Akbar for the respondents.

2. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India calling into question the notice dated 28.08.2023 issued by

respondent No.2-Deputy Director, Department of Mines and

Geology, requiring the petitioner to register under Rule 15 B of the

Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 [for short 'KMMC

Rules'].

3. The notice indicates that the petitioner is engaged in the

business of mineral based granite cutting and polishing in the name

NC: 2024:KHC:41765-DB

of M/s. Naveen Granites. As stated in the notice the mineral based

industrial unit is required to be registered under the KMMC

Amendment Rules, 2023.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner would submit

that the petitioner is a micro and small scale enterprise. The

industry run by the petitioner would not fall within the purview of the

Rules and therefore, would not be required to be registered under

the said Rules.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate would submit that

the notice issued under Rule 15 B(1) of the KMMC Amendment

Rules, 2023, was the subject matter in the case of M/s. Shanthala

Marbles and Granites vs. The State of Karnataka and another

in Writ Petition No.14024 of 2024, wherein a similar notice was

under challenge on similar grounds and this Court relegated the

petitioner to the authorities permitting the petitioner to file a reply.

6. In view of the order of this Court in Writ Petition No.14024 of

2024 and as the controversy is only at the notice stage, the

petitioner has a remedy to respond to the notice.

NC: 2024:KHC:41765-DB

7. The petitioner is at liberty to respond to the notice. The

competent authority shall decide the requirement of registration of

the petitioner industry strictly in accordance with law as per the

Rules and considering the reply of the petitioner.

8. The writ petition is disposed of as premature, relegating the

petitioner to file a reply to the notice and requiring the authorities to

take a decision within two months from the date of reply. The

Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

9. The Writ Petition stands dismissed subject to above.

Sd/-

(N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/-

(K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE

MV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter