Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28100 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:48104
RSA No. 679 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 679 OF 2010
BETWEEN:
1. RUDRAPPA
S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA
MAJOR,
2. PARVATHAMMA
W/O RUDRAPPA
MAJOR,
BOTH ARE R/O SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE,
SINGATAGERE HOBLI,
KADUR TALUK, CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. ABHINAY P. PATIL., ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
AND:
1. S. R. BASAPPA
SINCE DEAD REP. BY HIS LRS
Digitally signed
by ANUSHA V
Location: High (a) VISHALAMMA
Court Of W/O S. R. BASAPPA
Karnataka MAJOR,
(b) S.B. RAMESH
S/O LATE S. R. BASAPPA
MAJOR,
(c) S. B. CHANDRASHEKAR
S/O LATE S.R. BASAPPA
MAJOR,
(d) S.B. PARAMESHWARAPPA
S/O LATE S.R. BASAPPA
MAJOR,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:48104
RSA No. 679 of 2010
(e) NEELAMMA
W/O LATE NANJUNDAPPA,
MAJOR,
(f) S.B. PUSHPAVATHI
W/O SIDDARAMAIAH,
MAJOR,
ALL ARE i.e. L.RS. A, B, C, D, E & F ARE
R/O SHETTYHALLI VILLAGE,
SINGATAGEREHOBLI, KADUR TALUK,
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT.
2. RAMESH
S/O CHENNABASAPPA
MAJOR,
3. SIDDARAMAIAH
S/O CHENNABASAPPA
MAJOR,
RESPONDENTS NO.2 & 3 ARE
R/O SHETTIHALLI VILLAGE,
SINGATAGERE HOBLI, KADUR TALUK,
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G.S.BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (A,C, E&F),
R1(B) (i & ii) R1 (D) (i TO iii ) R2 & R3)
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 30.11.2009 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.46/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) &
ADDITIONAL CJM, ARSIKERE, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND
SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.10.1999
PASSED IN O.S.NO.28/1993 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL
JUDGE (JR.DN) ARSIKERE AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:48104
RSA No. 679 of 2010
ORAL JUDGMENT
Though matter was passed over and called again, there is
no representation on behalf of appellants.
2. On 12.07.2024 while allowing I.As.no.1 of 2023 to 6
of 2023, costs of Rs.1,000/- was ordered to be paid to High
Court Legal Services Committee and Rs.1,000/- to legal
representatives of deceased respondent no.1.
3. Despite lapse of time, said order has not been
complied. This would indicate that appellants are not
diligent in pursuing appeal. Hence, appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE
DL CT: JL
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!