Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 28066 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17117
RFA No. 100133 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100133 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI. VIRUPAXAPPA MALLAPPA TAMBARGUNDI,
AGE: 70 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: KALKERI-582118,
TALUKA: MUNDARGI,
DIST: GADAG.
2. SMT. SHARADA
W/O. VIRUPAXAPPA TAMBARGUNDI,
AGE: 59 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: KALKERI-582118,
TALUKA: MUNDARGI,
DIST: GADAG.
ASHPAK 3. SHRI. MANJUNATH
KASHIMSA
MALAGALADINNI S/O. VIRUPAXAPPA TAMBARGUNDI,
AGE: 35 YEARS,
OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O: KALKERI-582118,
TALUKA: MUNDARGI,
Location: DIST: GADAG.
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
4. SMT. SHOBHA @ PAVITRA
W/O. BASAVARAJ HULIKATTI,
AGE: 34 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HANGAL-581104,
DIST: HAVERI.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VIRUPAXAPPA AND OTHERS APPELLANTS UNREPRESENTED)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17117
RFA No. 100133 of 2017
AND:
1. SHRI. VISHWANATH
S/O. VIRUPAXAPPA TAMBARGUNDI,
AGE: 29 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: KALKERI-582118,
TALUKA: MUNDARGI,
DIST: GADAG.
2. SHRI. BASANAGOUDA
HANMANAGOUDA BASANAGOUDAR,
AGE: 59 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: VIDYA NAGAR,
MUNDARGI-582118,
DIST: GADAG.
3. SHRI. B.MALLIKARJUN
S/O. B.C. KOTRAPPA,
AGE: 65 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: SHIVABASAV NAGAR,
HAVERI-581110.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. C.R. GOULAY & SRI. SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATES FOR R2;
SRI. ARAVIND D. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
R1 SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RFA FILED UNDER SEC. 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 CPC,
1908, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2017
PASSED BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG IN O.S
34/2013; ALLOW THE APPEAL WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT BY
DECREEING THE SUIT IN O.S 34/2013 ON THE FILE OF ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:17117
RFA No. 100133 of 2017
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL JUDGMENT
Advocate for the appellants is dead. After the death
of the advocate, court notice was issued to the appellants.
Notices were served on appellants No.1, 2 and 3 and
notice is not served on appellant No.4.
There is no representation on behalf of appellants
No.1 to 3.
Appeal is of the year 2017. There is no reason to
adjourn the matter.
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
(ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
gab CT:ANB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!