Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26505 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16238
RSA No. 100379 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA
RSA NO. 100379 OF 2014 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
VASUDEV MONAPPA BADIGER,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. DHUPADAL,
TQ: GOKAK,
DIST: BELGAUM, PIN: 591 327.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. BAHUBALI N KANABARGI, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
VISHAL
AND:
VISHAL NINGAPPA
NINGAPPA PATTIHAL
PATTIHAL Date:
2024.11.08
10:53:17
+0530 1. YELLAVVA W/O. VITHAL MURIGEPPAGOL,
AGE: ABOUT 36 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. GOKAK, PIN: 591 329.
2. SHIDRAM NINGAPPA MURIGEPPAGOL,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
3. YELLAWWA SIDRAM MURIGEPPAGOL,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16238
RSA No. 100379 of 2014
4. NINGAPPA SIDRAM MURIGEPPAGOL,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE.
5. ASHOK SIDRAM MURIGEPPAGOL
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE.
ALL ARE RESIDENT OF CATTLE MARKET,
GHATAPRABHA, TQ: GOKAK,
DIST: BELGAUM, PIN-591 328.
6. MALLIKARJUN SATTEPPA BENAWAD,
AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
R/O. MRUTUNJAYA CIRCLE GHATAPRABHA,
TQ: GOKAK,
DIST: BELGAUM, PIN-591 328.
... RESPONDENTS
(R6 NOTICE SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.02.2014 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.05/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, GOKAK, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.06.2005 AND THE
DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.278/2002 ON THE FILE OF
THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN.) GOKAK, DECREEING
THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE
POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:16238
RSA No. 100379 of 2014
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)
Memo is filed by the appellant seeking to withdraw
the appeal as the parties have settled the dispute.
2. The memo is taken on record, which reads as
under:
"For the reasons stated in this memo, Advocate for appellant most humbly prays that the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to Permit the appellant to withdraw the Appeal as Appellants are instructed me to withdraw the Appeal, because they have compromised befor Trial Court. Hence The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss as withdraw the Appeal in the interest of justiceand equity."
3. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In light of disposal of the appeal, pending IAs' if
any would not survive for consideration.
Sd/-
(JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!