Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Sandhya vs Sri Suryakanth
2024 Latest Caselaw 26262 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 26262 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Smt Sandhya vs Sri Suryakanth on 5 November, 2024

Author: N S Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N S Sanjay Gowda

                                               -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC:44466
                                                       MFA No. 8632 of 2018




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024

                                             BEFORE
                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
                   MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8632 OF 2018(MV-I)


                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    SMT. SANDHYA @ VANAJA
                         W/O. SATHISH ACHAR
                         AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
                         R/O. VINAYAKA NAGAR
                         KUMBHASHI, KUNDAPURA TALUK
                         UDUPI DISTRICT - 572 101.
                                                               ...APPELLANT
                   (BY SRI S. M. ANJAL, FOR;
                       SRI K. PRASANNA SHETTY, ADVOCATES)

                   AND:

                   1.    SRI SURYAKANTH
                         S/O. SHIVALINGAPPA
                         AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
Digitally signed
by KIRAN                 DRIVER
KUMAR R                  GULBARGA K.S.R.T.C. DEPOT.
Location: HIGH           GULBARGA - 550 311.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   2.    MANAGING DIRECTOR
                         K.S.R.T.C., GULBARGA DEPOT.
                         GULBARGA - 550 311.
                                                            ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY B. L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R-2;
                       VIDE ORDER DATED 15.10.2024, NOTICE TO R-1
                       IS DISPENSED WITH)
                            -2-
                                          NC: 2024:KHC:44466
                                    MFA No. 8632 of 2018




     THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17/08/2016,
PASSED IN MVC NO.1016/2012, ON THE FILE OF THE
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND MACT,
UDUPI (SITTING AT KUNDAPURA), PARTLY ALLOWING THE
CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

    THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA


                    ORAL JUDGMENT

1. Being dissatisfied with the award of compensation of

Rs.1,84,440/-, the claimant is in appeal seeking

enhancement.

2. The occurrence of the accident and the liability to

pay compensation by the KSRTC are not in dispute.

3. The Tribunal has come to the conclusion that the

claimant has suffered disability to the extent of 9%

and has chosen to disregard the evidence of the

doctor who has stated that the claimant had suffered

the disability at 18% to the limb. In my view, the

NC: 2024:KHC:44466

disability assessed by Tribunal at 9% to the whole

body cannot be found fault with.

4. However, the Tribunal has committed an error in

assessing the notional income of the claimant at

Rs.4,000/-. Since there was no evidence to that

effect, as the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authority has determined the notional income as

Rs.7,000/- for the accident of the year 2012, it would

be appropriate to determine the notional income of

the claimant at Rs.7,000/-. Since the claimant is

aged about 26 to 30 years, the appropriate multiplier

would be '17'. Consequently, the claimant would be

entitled to a sum of Rs.1,28,520/- (Rs.7,000/- X 12

X '17' X 9%) towards 'loss of future earnings'.

5. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.25,000/- towards 'pain

and sufferings' and has not awarded any amount

towards 'loss of amenities'. Having regard to the

disability suffered by the claimant at 9%, it would be

NC: 2024:KHC:44466

appropriate to award a sum of Rs.50,000/- each

under the said heads.

6. The Tribunal has taken the laid-up period as 1½

months, since the claimant was hospitalised for 17

days, it would be appropriate to take the laid-up

period as 3 months and consequently, the claimant

would be entitled to a sum of Rs.21,000/-

(Rs.7,000/- X 3 months) towards 'loss of earnings

during the laid-up period'.

7. The Tribunal has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards

'conveyance, nutritious food and attendant charges'.

In my view, it would be appropriate to enhance the

said sum to Rs.25,000/- since the claimant was

hospitalised for 17 days.

8. As regards Rs.65,000/- awarded towards 'medical

expenses', which is based on documentary evidence

and the sum of Rs.5,000/- awarded towards 'future

medical expenses' are just and proper, and are

accordingly affirmed.

NC: 2024:KHC:44466

9. Consequently, the award of the Tribunal is modified

and the following sums are awarded as

compensation:

                                            As awarded     As awarded
     Sl.                                      by the         by this
            Compensation under               Tribunal         Court
     No.      different Heads
                                              (Rs.)          (Rs.)

     1.     Pain and sufferings               25,000/-       50,000/-

            Loss     of        future         73,440/-     1,28,520/-
     2.
            earnings

     3.     Medical expenses                  65,000/-       65,000/-

            Loss   of   income                 6,000/-       21,000/-
     4.     during the laid up
            period

            Conveyance,                       10,000/-       25,000/-
     5.     nourishment            and
            nutritious food

            Loss of amenities in               Nil           50,000/-
     6.
            life

     7.     Future            medical          5,000/-           5,000/-
            expenses

                                         1,84,440/- 3,44,520/-
                      Total


10. Accordingly, the claimant is held entitled to a

compensation of Rs.3,44,520/- as against

Rs.1,84,440/- along with interest at the rate of 6%

NC: 2024:KHC:44466

p.a. on the enhanced compensation amount from the

date of petition till its realisation.

11. However, the claimant would not be entitled to a

interest for the delayed period as per order dated

22.10.2024.

12. The KSRTC is directed to deposit the amount of

compensation awarded within two months from the

date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

13. The other aspects of the Award of the Tribunal

remain undisturbed.

14. The appeal is, accordingly, allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

HNM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter