Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ambarish vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 11999 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 11999 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 May, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Ambarish vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 May, 2024

Author: S.Vishwajith Shetty

Bench: S.Vishwajith Shetty

                                             -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439
                                                    CRL.P No. 200469 of 2024




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                            DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2024

                                           BEFORE

                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY

                        CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200469 OF 2024 (482)

                   BETWEEN:

                        AMBARISH
                        S/O SUBASH RATHOD,
                        AGE: 39 YEARS,
                        OCC: STONE CUTTING WORK,
                        RESIDENCE OF JANAGERI,
                        TQ: AND DIST: VIJAYAPURA,
                        NOW RESIDING AT
                        UDBHAV HANUMANT TEMPLE,
                        BIDDAPUR COLONY,
                        KALABURAGI-585 103.
                                                               ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI KEDAR DESAI, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed
by SHILPA R
TENIHALLI
Location: HIGH
                   1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                        THROUGH ASHOK NAGAR P.S.,
                        KALABURAGI REPRESENTED BY
                        THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
                        HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                        KALABURAGI BENCH.

                   2.   SAGAR S/O SOHANLAL RANKA,
                        AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: BUISNESSMAN,
                        R/O INDUSTRIAL AREA,
                        JEWARGI CROSS, KALABURAGI-585 102.
                                                             ...RESPONDENTS
                   (BY SMT. ANITA M. REDDY, HCGP FOR R-1;
                                -2-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439
                                     CRL.P No. 200469 of 2024




NOTICE TO R-2 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DTD.30.05.2024)

     THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 R/W 439(1)(B) OF CR.P.C.
PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION BY SETTING ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 04.04.2024 PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE
COURT OF I ADDL. DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KALABURAGI
IN CRL. MISC. NO.412/2024 IN CONSEQUENCE OF WHICH
MODIFY THE CONDITION NO.2 OF THE BAIL ORDER DATED
29.01.2024 PASSED BY THE HONOURABLE COURT OF I ADDL.
DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN CRL. MISC. NO.59/2024.

     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

Petitioner who is accused No.1 in S.C.No.82/2022

pending before the Court of I Additional District and

Sessions Judge at Kalaburagi arising out of Crime

No.46/2022 registered by Ashoknagar Police Station,

Kalaburagi for offences punishable under Sections 143,

147, 148, 149, 302, 397, 120(B) and 201 read with

Section 149 of Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1)(a)

and 27(3) of the Indian Arms Act, 1959 is before this

Court with a prayer to set aside the order dated

04.04.2024 passed by the Court of the I Additional

Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in Crl.Misc.No.412/2024 and

consequently modify Condition No.2 of the order passed in

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

Crl.Misc.No.59/2024 by the court of the I Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi dated 29.01.2024.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent

No.1/State.

3. Petitioner has been charge-sheeted for the

aforesaid offences in Crime No.46/2020 and he is being

tried for the said offences before the court of I Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in

S.C.No.82/2022. Petitioner was granted regular bail in the

said case in Crl.Misc.No.1712/2022 disposed of on

30.08.2022 by the jurisdictional Sessions Court.

Subsequently, he had jumped the bail. The Trial Court had

issued non-bailable warrant against him on 04.12.2023.

Thereafter the petitioner appeared before the Trial Court

voluntarily. However, the Trial Court taking into

consideration that he had violated the bail conditions that

was imposed on him in Crl.Misc.No.1712/2022, cancelled

his bail bonds and remanded him to judicial custody.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

Subsequently, the petitioner had filed Crl.Misc.No.59/2024

before the Trial Court under Section 439 of Cr.P.C and

same was allowed on 29.01.2024 subject to certain

conditions. Condition No.2 imposed by the Trial Court in its

order dated 29.01.2024 passed in Crl.Misc.No.59/2024

reads as follows:-

"2. The petitioner shall deposit forfeited previous bail bond amount in five installments."

4. Being aggrieved by the same, petitioner had

filed an application under Section 439(1)(b) of Cr.P.C in

Crl.Misc.No.412/2024 which was dismissed by the Trial

Court vide the order impugned dated 04.04.2024.

Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Condition No.2 imposed by the Trial Court while granting

regular bail to the petitioner in Crl.Misc.No.59/2024 is

illegal and without following the prescribed procedure

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

under law. The Trial Court was not justified in directing the

petitioner to deposit the forfeited bail amount.

6. Per contra, learned High Court Government

Pleader has opposed the petition. She submits that

petitioner who was granted regular bail earlier in

Crl.Misc.No.1712/2022 had jumped the bail and therefore

his bail bonds were cancelled and the surety furnished by

him was also discharged. Under the circumstances, the

Trial Court was fully justified in imposing the impugned

condition. Accordingly, she prays to dismiss the petition.

7. Section 441 of Cr.P.C provides for bond of

accused and sureties and Section 441A of Cr.P.C provides

for declaration by the sureties. Section 444 of Cr.P.C

provides for discharge of sureties and Section 446 of

Cr.P.C provides for procedure when bond has been

forfeited. Section 446A of Cr.P.C provides for cancellation

of bond and bail bond.

8. Sections 446 and 446A of Cr.P.C reads as

follows :-

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

"446. Procedure when bond has been forfeited. - (1) Where a bond under this Code is for appearance, or for production of property, before a Court and it is proved to the satisfaction of that Court or of any Court to which the case has subsequently been transferred, that the bond has been forfeited,

or where, in respect of any other bond under this Code, it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court by which the bond was taken, or of any Court to which the case has subsequently been transferred, or of the Court of any Magistrate of the first class, that the bond has been forfeited,

the Court shall record the grounds of such proof, and may call upon any person bound by such bond to pay the penalty thereof or to show cause why it should not be paid.

Explanation. - A condition in a bond for appearance, or for production of property, before a Court shall be construed as including a condition for appearance, or as the case may be, for production of property, before any Court to which the case may subsequently be transferred.

(2) If sufficient cause is not shown and the penalty is not paid, the Court may proceed to recover the same as if such penalty were a fine imposed by it under this Code:

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

[Provided that where such penalty is not paid and cannot be recovered in the manner aforesaid, the person so bound as surety shall be liable, by order of the Court ordering the recovery of the penalty, to imprisonment in civil jail for a term which may extend to six months.]

(3) The Court may, [after recording its reasons for doing so], remit any portion of the penalty mentioned and enforce payment in part only.

(4) Where a surety to a bond dies before the bond is forfeited, his estate shall be discharged from all liability in respect of the bond.

(5) Where any person who has furnished security under section 106 or section 117 or section 360 is convicted of an offence the commission of which constitutes a breach of the conditions of his bond, or of a bond executed in lieu of his bond under section 448, a certified copy of the judgment of the Court by which he was convicted of such offence may be used as evidence in proceedings under this section against his surety or sureties, and, if such certified copy is so used, the Court shall presume that such offence was committed by him unless the contrary is proved.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

446A. Cancellation of bond and bail bond.- Without prejudice to the provisions of section 446, where a bond under this Code is for appearance of a person in a case and it is forfeited for breach of a condition--

(a) the bond executed by such person as well as the bond, if any, executed by one or more of his sureties in that case shall stand cancelled; and

(b) thereafter no such person shall be released only on his own bond in that case, if the Police Officer or the Court, as the case may be, for appearance before whom the bond was executed, is satisfied that there was no sufficient cause for the failure of the person bound by the bond to comply with its condition;

Provided that subject to any other provision of this Code he may be released in that case upon the execution of a fresh personal bond for such sum of money and bond by one or more of such sureties as the Police Officer or the Court, as the case may be, thinks sufficient."

9. Perusal of the material available on record

would go to show that the prescribed procedure in the

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

aforesaid provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure has not

been followed in the present case by the Trial Court and

instead the Trial Court imposed a condition in the bail

order passed in Crl.Misc.No.59/2024 dated 29.01.2024

directing the petitioner to deposit the forfeited previous

bail bond amount in five installments. In my considered

view that such a condition could not have been imposed

by the Trial Court in the absence of complying the

requirement of the aforesaid provisions of law. Therefore,

the impugned condition imposed by the Trial Court in

Crl.Misc.No.59/2024 dated 29.01.2024 and the order

passed in Crl.Misc.No.412/2024 dated 04.04.2024

rejecting the petitioner's application filed for modification

of the impugned condition cannot be sustained.

Accordingly, the following :

ORDER

The criminal petition is allowed.

The order dated 04.04.2024 passed by the court of

the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi in

Crl.Misc.No.412/2024 dated 04.04.2024 is set-aside and

- 10 -

NC: 2024:KHC-K:3439

consequently, the impugned Condition No.2 imposed by

the Court of the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,

Kalaburagi in Crl.Misc.No.59/2024 dated 29.01.2024

stands deleted.

All other conditions imposed in Crl.Misc.No.412/2024

dated 04.04.2024 remained unaltered.

If the petitioner has deposited any amount before

the Trial Court pursuant to the impugned Condition No.2

imposed by the Trial Court in Crl.Misc.No.59/2024, the

said amount is directed to be refunded to the petitioner.

It is made clear that this order will not come in the

way of the Trial Court proceedings against the petitioner

or his surety for recovery of the bail bond amount in

accordance with law.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter