Karnataka High Court
Smt Gangamma vs Smt Gowramma on 1 March, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2527 OF 2023 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. GANGAMMA,
W/O GANGADHARAIAH AND
D/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
R/AT NO 1, 21ST MAIN ROAD,
J C NAGARA, KURUBARAHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 086.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MAHESH B.J., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT. GOWRAMMA,
Digitally W/O LATE M.H. MARISHAMAIAH,
signed by BS
RAVIKUMAR AGED AOBUT 83 YEARS,
Location: R/AT MALLARABANAVADI KASABA HOBLI,
HIGH
COURT OF NELAMANGALA TALUK,
KARNATAKA
BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 123.
2. SMT. KEMPAMMA,
W/O LATE GANGAPPA AND
D/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED AOBUT 80 YEARS,
R/O KUDUR VILLAGE,
KUDUR HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA - 562 159.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
3. SMT. SHARADAMMA,
W/O CHIKKAMAGADAIAH AND
D/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
R/O CHANNAVALLI VILLAGE,
THYAMAGONDLU HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST.- 562 123.
4. SMT. SAVITHRAMMA,
W/O LATE GOVINDARAJU AND
D/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
R/O NO. 95, 2ND STAGE,
K.H.B COLONY,
BASAVESHWARANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560 079.
5. SMT. SAROJAMMA,
W/O PUTTAGANGAIAH,
D/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/O NO 84, BHAGIRATHI ROAD,
4TH CROSS, 1ST MAIN,
AKSHAYANAGAR EAST,
HULIMAVU, BENGALURU - 560 076.
6. SRI. G. MAHADEVAIAH,
S/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
7. SRI. G. SHIVASHANKARAIAH,
S/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS.
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
8. SRI. G. VISHWANATHA,
S/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.
RESPONDENTS 6 TO 8 ARE
R/O MALLARABANAVADI, KASABA HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 123.
9. SMT. HONNAMMA,
W/O LATE B.H. MALLIKARJUNAPPA AND
D/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS,
R/O BARAGENAHALLI, SOMPURA HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 123.
10. SMT. PREMA,
W/O B.H. HONNAPPA AND
D/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/O FLAT NO. B3 1308,
13TH FLOOR, BRAMHAGIRI BDA APARTMENT,
NAGARABHAVI 8TH BLOCK,
2ND STAGE, MALAGALA,
BANGALORE - 560 072.
11. SMT. VASANTHAKUMARI,
W/O LATE PRABHUDEVA AND
D/O LATE M.H. GANGAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
R/O KENKEREPALYA, KUDUR HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 561 101.
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
12. SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O LATE M.H. MARISHAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS.
13. SRI. M. MANJUNATHAIAH,
S/O LATE M.H. MARISHAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS.
14. SRI. M. VISHWANATHA,
S/O LATE M.H. MARISHAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
15. SRI. M. SATHISHA,
S/O LATE M.H. MARISHAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 12 TO 15 ARE
R/O MALLARABANAVADI, KASABA HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 123.
16. SRI. H. HONNASHAMAIAH,
S/O LATE HONNAGANGAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
R/O MALLARABANAVADI, KASABA HOBLI,
NELAMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DIST - 562 123.
17. SRI. SATISH D PATEL,
S/O DINESH H PATEL,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
18. SRI. RAJESH M PATEL,
S/O MUNILAL H PATEL,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
-5-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
RESPONDENTS NO.17 AND 18
R/O AT NO.43, 14TH MAIN ROAD,
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040.
19. SRI. DHANJI PATEL,
S/O LATE MANJI PATEL,
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS.
20. SRI. ARJUN PATEL,
S/O LATE MANJI PATEL,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.19 AND 20
ARE RESIDENT OF HOVNOOR
EXTENSION, 1ST CROSS,
HESARGHATTA ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 057.
21. SRI. KAUSHIK S MAKANI,
S/O SHIVJI BHAI PATEL,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O BHIMDEV NIVASA,
NO.1043/B, 11TH MAIN,
RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040
...RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O.43 RULE 1(r) R/W SEC.151 OF
CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED.13.03.2023 PASSED ON IA
NO.1 IN OS.NO.171/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE, NELAMANGALA, REJECTING IA NO.1 FILED U/O.39
RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC.
-6-
NC: 2024:KHC:8834
MFA No. 2527 of 2023
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
A memo is filed by the appellant to dismiss the appeal
has become infructuous.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as it
has become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KBM
CT:SNN
