Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Gopal K Shettar vs Sri. Ravi S/O. Narayanrao Kulkarni
2024 Latest Caselaw 15085 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15085 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Gopal K Shettar vs Sri. Ravi S/O. Narayanrao Kulkarni on 28 June, 2024

                                            -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC-D:8876
                                                   CRL.RP No. 100273 of 2017




                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                           DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
                                          BEFORE
                            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH
                 CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100273 OF 2017 (397)
                BETWEEN:

                SRI. GOPAL K.SHETTAR,
                AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                R/O: RAJESHWARI NAGAR 6TH CROSS,
                BANAKAR BUILDING,
                RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
                                                                 ...PETITIONER
                (BY SRI PRUTHVIRAJ P.HITTALAMANI, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                SRI. RAVI S/O. NARAYANRAO KULKARNI,
                AGE:49 YEARS, OCC: MANAGER,
                GAYATRI FINANCE CORPORATION RANEBENNUR,
                R/O: BEHIND OLD TALUK OFFICE,
                NEAR GOTUR ANJANEYA TEMPLE,
                RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI.
                                                               ...RESPONDENT
                (BY SRI GIRISH A.YADAWAD, ADVOCATE)
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN                THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
KATTIMANI
                SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE
                THE JUDGMENT DATED 26.08.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE
                II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AT HAVERI (SITTING AT
HIGH            RANEBENNUR) IN REJECTING THE APPEAL 22 OF 2011 FILED BY THE
COURT OF        PETITIONER HEREIN AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT OF
KARNATAKA
                CONVICTION AND SENTENCE PASSED BY ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND II
                ADDL. JMFC RANEBENNUR IN C.C.NO.192/2005 AND TO SET ASIDE
                THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 30.04.2011 PASSED BY THE
                ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND II ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR IN
                C.C.NO.192/2005 AND CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER
                HEREIN FOR THE OFFENCES WITH WHICH HE HAS BEEN CHARGED,
                IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

                     THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
                THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:8876
                                       CRL.RP No. 100273 of 2017




                               ORDER

The learned counsel for the respective parties are

present. The complainant and the accused are also present.

They filed joint memo stating that the matter has been settled

between the parties. The contents of the said joint memo which

reads thus:

"The petitioner and the respondent in the present matter have amicably settled the matter, the petitioner and respondent have jointly agreed that, the petitioner is required to pay Rs.40,000/- to the respondent as full and final settlement. The petitioner has deposited the entire cheque amount before the trial court and the respondent is at liberty to withdraw the entire cheque amount of Rs.33,430/- deposited before the trial court and the remaining balance of Rs.6,600/- is paid in cash today to the respondent and the respondent acknowledges the receipt of the same. In view of the same the entire agreed amount of Rs.40,000/- is received by the respondent. As such the respondent admits that there shall be no further claim laid against the petitioner with respect to present cheque amount and also the petitioner admits that he shall not dispute for withdrawal of cheque amount by the respondent."

2. On perusal of the said joint memo, there is no

embargo to this Court to record the compromise as the offence

NC: 2024:KHC-D:8876

is compoundable in nature. Therefore, I proceed to pass the

following:

ORDER

i. The petition is allowed in terms of the compromise.

ii. The judgment and order dated 26.08.2017 passed by the II Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Haveri sitting at Ranebennur in Criminal Appeal No.22/2011 confirming the judgment and order dated 30.04.2011 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge and II Addl. J.M.F.C., Ranebennur in C.C.No.192/2005 are hereby set aside.

iii. The petitioner is acquitted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

iv. Bail bonds executed, if any, stands cancelled.

v. The Trial Court is directed to release the amount in favour of the complainant after production of this order.

Sd/-

JUDGE CLK_CT:ANB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter