Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15043 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:24169
RSA No. 1891 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1891 OF 2021 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
1. MR VASANTHA S MOOLYA
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
2. MRS. REVATHI
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
3. MRS. LEELAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
4. MRS. MALATHI
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M 5. MR. VISHWANATH
Location: HIGH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
6. MRS. PUSHPAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
ALL ARE THE CHILDREN OF LATE HONAMMA
ALL ARE R/AT PERIYADIBEEDU HOUSE
POST KALLIGE VILLAGE - 574 143
BANTWAL TALUK
DAKSHINA KANNADA
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI CHANDRANATH ARIGA K, ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:24169
RSA No. 1891 of 2021
AND:
1. SMT. PADMAVATHI
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
W/O HUVVAIAH MOOLYALA
2. SRI PURUSHOTHAM
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
3. SRI PADMANABHA
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
4. SRI MANOHAR
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
5. SMT. SHOBHA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 5 ARE
CHILDREN OF LATE HOOVAYYA MOOLYA
ALL ARE RESIDING AT PUDIKELAYYA
KODI HOUSE,
KALLIGE POST AND VILLAGE 574 143
6. SRI LINGAPPA BANGERA
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
S/O MADANA MOOLYA
R/AT ROOM NO.7
SUKHISAMSAR BUILDING
OPPOSITE TO ABHINAV VIDYA MANDIR SCHOOL
GURUDEV ROAD, BANDRA (E) - 400037
THANE DISTRICT, MAHARASTRA
7. SMT. JANAKI
AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
8. SRI JARAPPA MOOLYA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
9. SRI HONNAYYA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
RESPONDENTS NO.6 - 9 ARE
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:24169
RSA No. 1891 of 2021
THE CHILDREN OF LATE MADANAMOOLYA'S
SECOND WIFE (LAXMI)
ALL ARE R/AT PUKIKELAYYA
KODI HOUSE
POST KALLIGE VILLAGE 574 143
BANTWAL TALUK, D K
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2020
PASSED IN R.A.No.01/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE
PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL,
D.K, AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the appellants has
filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw
the appeal on the ground that the matter has been
compromised in R.S.A.No.1046/2020. The memo is taken
on record. In view of the memo, the counsel for the
appellants is permitted to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!