Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12841 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:22602-DB
RP No. 737 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 737 OF 2022
IN
I.T.A.NO.155/2017
BETWEEN:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX, CENTRAL
CIRCLE, C.R. BUILDING,
QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
Digitally OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL
signed by CIRCLE-6(3)(2), PRESENT
BHARATHI S ADDRESS DCIT, CENTRAL
Location: high CIRCLE-1(4), C.R. BUILDING,
court of
karnataka QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. S.M. KAMAL PASHA
#3, 4TH MAIN,
JAYAMAHAL EXTENSION,
BENGALURU - 560 046.
...RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1
R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO I) REVIEW / RECALL THE
ORDER DATED 02/08/2022 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA
NO. 155/2017. II) TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:22602-DB
RP No. 737 of 2022
THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS
AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE
AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
S SUNIL DUTT YADAV J., THE COURT PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
IA No.1/2023 has been filed seeking to recall the order
dated 03.03.2023 and to restore the review petition.
It is stated that ITA was dismissed in light of failure to comply
with the office objections.
2. The application IA No.2/2023 seeking condonation
of delay in filing the application for recalling the order dated
03.03.2023 is filed.
3. At the time of hearing of the applications, it is
brought to the notice of this Court that the Hon'ble Apex Court
in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Central Vs. Abhisar Buildwell Pvt. Ltd., reported in (2024)
2 SCC 433 has laid down that the proceedings under Section
153-A can be initiated only if incriminating material is found
during the course of search.
NC: 2024:KHC:22602-DB
4. It is submitted that the Division Bench in its order
has also arrived at the same conclusion, which now finds
affirmation by the subsequent judgment of the Hon'ble Apex
Court. If that were to be so, even on merits, no grounds are
made out for considering the review petition. Accordingly, no
purpose would be served by issuing notice on IA No.2/2023 to
the private assessee.
5. Accordingly, the pending applications are rejected
as not meriting consideration. Consequently, the review
petition stands rejected.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!