Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12575 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:19302
MFA No. 3259 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3259 OF 2022 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI S. NARAYANASWAMY,
S/O SRI.SRINIVASAIAH,
AGED 55 YEARS,
R/AT NO.9, SRI CHOWDESHWARI MAHAL,
'D' ASHWATHAPPA LAYOUT,
SAHAKARNAGAR, KODIGEHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 092.
2. SRI A. SRINIVASAIAH,
S/O ASHWATHAPPA,
AGED 72 YEARS,
R/AT NO.9, SRI CHOWDESHWARI MAHAL,
'D' ASHWATHAPPA LAYOUT,
SAHAKARNAGAR, KODIGEHALLI,
Digitally signed by BENGALURU - 560 092.
GEETHAKUMARI
PARLATTAYA S
Location: High 3. SMT. AMMAYAMMA,
Court of Karnataka
W/O A. SRINIVASAIAH,
AGED 70 YEARS,
R/AT NO.9, SRI CHOWDESHWARI MAHAL,
'D' ASHWATHAPPA LAYOUT,
SAHAKARNAGAR, KODIGEHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 092.
4. SRI HARISH S,
S/O SRINIVASAIAH,
AGED 50 YEARS,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:19302
MFA No. 3259 of 2022
R/AT NO.9, SRI CHOWDESHWARI MAHAL,
'D' ASHWATHAPPA LAYOUT,
SAHAKARNAGAR, KODIGEHALLI,
BENGALURU - 560 092.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI CHANDAN GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S. NTI EMPLOYEES,
HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,
G-5, PALACE ORCHARDS,
APARTMENT NO.51, 9TH MAIN,
6TH CROSS, R.M.V. EXTENSION,
BENGALURU - 560 090.
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI R.V.JAYAPRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC,
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.03.2022 PASSED ON I.A. NO.
1 IN O.S.NO.1372/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU
CITY (CCH-40), DISMISSING THE I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER
ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for respondent has filed a memo stating
that plaint in O.S.no.1372/2022 on file of 39th Additional City
Civil Judge (CCH-40), Bengaluru, out of which this appeal
arises, came to be rejected by order dated 18.01.2024 passed
by this Court in CRP.no.721/2023 on an application under
NC: 2024:KHC:19302
Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. In view of same, present appeal
would not survive for consideration.
2. Learned counsel for appellants, on other hand has filed
a memo stating that order passed in CRP.no.721/2023
questioned before Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C)
no.7204/2024 wherein notice is ordered.
3. Since there is no interim order of stay, present appeal
would not survive for consideration and is dismissed as such.
Liberty is reserved to appellants to seek for revival in case they
succeed in Special Leave Petition.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MKM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!