Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Shanthi Prakash vs The Principal Secretary
2024 Latest Caselaw 12573 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 12573 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 June, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Shanthi Prakash vs The Principal Secretary on 5 June, 2024

Author: B M Shyam Prasad

Bench: B M Shyam Prasad

                                       -1-
                                                    NC: 2024:KHC:19358
                                                  WP No. 13096 of 2024




            IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                 DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024

                                 BEFORE
             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
                 WRIT PETITION NO. 13096 OF 2024 (S-RES)
            BETWEEN:

            SRI. SHANTHI PRAKASH
            S/O LATE CHIKKANNA
            FIRST DIVISION CLERK (RETIRED)
            AGED ABOUT 63 YEAR,
            RESIDING AT NADEMAVINAMARA,
            KUNIGAL TALUK, YADIYURU HOBLI,
            TUMKURU DIST - 572 130.
                                                   ...PETITIONER
            (BY SRI. GIRI KUMAR S V., ADVOCATE)

            AND:

Digitally
signed by   1.   THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
NARASIMHA
MURTHY           ANIMAL HUSBANDRY FISHERIES,
VANAMALA
Location:        VIKAS SOUDHA, 4TH FLOOR,
HIGH
COURT OF         DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
KARNATAKA
                 BENGALURU - 560 001.

            2.   THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
                 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE,
                 AND REFORMS, VIKAS SOUDHA,
                 BENGALURU - 560 001.

            3.   DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES
                 PODIYAM BLOCK, 3RD FLOOR,
                                 -2-
                                                NC: 2024:KHC:19358
                                          WP No. 13096 of 2024




      V V TOWER, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
      BENGALURU - 560 001.

4.    DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES
      NATIONAL FISH SEED FARM,
      B R PROJECT, BHADRAVATI (T)
      SHIMOGA 577 115.

5.    ASST. DIRECTOR OF FISHERIES
      VANI VILASA SAGARA,
      HIRIYUR (T)
      CHITRADURGA - 577 599.
                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE)

       THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
THE    ISSUED     ENDORSEMENT         BEARING    VIDE   NO.
ENDORSEMENT /NINI/ADMINISTRATION (02)/01/2023
DATED 25/03/2024 IS HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-E
ISSUED BY R3; DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER IS IN
COMPLIANCE        OF    UMADEVI'S     JUDGMENT       DATED
10/06/2006 SINCE THE PETITIONER ADMITTEDLY IN
THE      ENDORSEMENT           BEARING        VIDE      NO.
ENDORSEMENT / NINI/ADMINISTRATION (2)/01/2023
DATED 25/03/2024 IS HEREWITH AS ANNEXURE-E
THAT    HE   IS     WORKING     SINCE    14/11/1988      IN
SANCTIONED / SUPERNUMERARY POST.

       THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING,     THIS      DAY,   THE     COURT   MADE      THE
FOLLOWING:
                                  -3-
                                               NC: 2024:KHC:19358
                                            WP No. 13096 of 2024




                           ORDER

The petitioner, who is now aged 63 years, was

in employment with the Directorate of Fisheries [the

third respondent] as a Daily Wager. The State

Government, acting under the provisions of the

Karnataka Daily Wage Employees' Welfare Act 2012,

has issued the Notification dated 28.06.2014

signifying that the petitioner shall continue as a Daily

Wager until he completes the age of 60 years, and he

shall be entitled for certain consequential benefits.

The petitioner, upon completing 60 years, is paid a

sum of Rs.5,62,154/- in accordance with the afore

Act1.

The petitioner thereafter viz., on 21.12.2023

has filed a representation, in terms of the liberty

reserved by this Court while disposing of his

subsequent writ petition in W.P.No.24495/2023 [S-

1 Obviously, there is an error in mentioning the Act in the Communication dated 25.03.2024 as Daily Wages Act, 1972.

NC: 2024:KHC:19358

RES], seeking regularization and consequential

benefits. The petitioner's case for regularization has

been considered under the relevant Rules and

thereafter notification is issued to stipulate that the

petitioner will continue as a Daily Wager until the

completion of 60 years being entitled to certain

financial benefits, and if the petitioner has received

such benefits, this Court must observe that no

exception can be taken with the impugned

Communication dated 25.03.2024 [Annexure-E]

whereby, the petitioner is informed that his request

for regularization, cannot be considered for the

reasons as stated above.

Therefore, the petition is rejected.

Sd/-

JUDGE

RB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter