Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19123 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 100129 OF 2022
C/W
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 100116 OF 2022
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 100128 OF 2022
MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 100135 OF 2022
IN MSA NO.100129/2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. KARIYAPPA S/O. NINGAPPA MANIHAL,
AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTRAL,
R/O: SUNNAL - 591123.
TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. G.N. NARASAMMANAVAR AND
SRI. P. V. SAMBARGI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
YASHAVANT 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
NARAYANKAR BAILHONGAL AT: BAILHONGAL,
TQ: BAILHONGAL - 591102
Location: HIGH DIST: BELAGAVI.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI,
AT: BELAGAVI
TQ & DIST: BELAGAVI - 590001.
3. THE TAHASILDAR RAMDURG, RAMDURG,
AT: RAMDURG - 591123
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 & R2)
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
THIS MSA IS FILED U/S 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT
1894, PRAYING TO ENHANCED THE MARKET VALUE AT THE RATE OF
RS.3,66,000/- PER ACRE WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS BY
MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC NO.
117/2008 DTD 22.12.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN)
RAMDURG AND LAC APPEAL NO.175/2019 DTD 10.08.2022 PASSED
BY THE XITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BELAGAVI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND THIS APPEAL BE
ALLOWED WITH COSTS.
IN MSA NO.100116/2022
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI. KARIYAPPA S/O MUDAKAPPA MANIHAL,
AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTRAL,
R/O: SUNNAL - 591123
TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
2. SHRI. YALLAPPA S/O. MUDAKAPPA MANIHAL,
AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTRAL,
R/O: SUNNAL - 591123
TQ: RAMDURG, DIST: BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. G.N. NARASAMMANAVAR AND
SRI. P. V. SAMBARGI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BAILHONGAL, AT: BAILHONGAL,
TQ: BAILHONGAL - 591102
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI,
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
TQ & DIST: BELAGAVI - 590001.
3. THE TAHASILDAR RAMADRUG,
RAMDURG,
AT. RAMDURG - 591123
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS MSA IS FILED U/SEC.54(2) OF LAND ACQUISITION ACT,
1894, PRAYING TO ENHANCED THE MARKET VALUE AT THE RATE OF
RS.3,66,000/- PER ACRE WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS BY
MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC
NO.118/2019 DATED 22.12.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE
(SR.DN), RAMDURG AND LAC APPEAL NO.176/2019 DATD
10.08.2022 PASSED BY THE XI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS
JDUGE, BELAGAVI IN THE INTERST OF JUSTICE AND THIS APPEAL
BE ALLOWED WITH COSTS.
IN MSA NO.100128/2022
BETWEEN:
1. SHRI. HUSAINSAB S/O. SAIDUSAB MUDDAPUR
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
SMT. JAFFERBEE ALIAS JAPHARABI W/O. HUSAINSAB,
MUDDAPUR, AGE: 74 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD, R/O: SUNNAL,
TAL: RAMDURG - 591123,
BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
2. SHRI. SAIYADASAB S/O. HUSENSAB MUDDAPUR,
AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: SUNNAL, TAL: RAMDURG-591123,
BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. G.N. NARASAMMANAVAR AND
SRI. P. V. SAMBARGI, ADVOCATES)
-4-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
AND:
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BAILHONGAL, AT: BAILHONGAL,
TQ: BAILHONGAL - 591102
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BELAGAVI AT: BELAGAVI,
TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI - 590001
3. THE TAHASILDAR RAMDURG,
RAMDURG, AT: RAMDURG - 591123.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS MSA IS FILED U/S 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT
1894, PRAYING TO ENHANCED THE MARKET VALUE AT THE RATE OF
RS.3,66,000/- PER ACRE WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS BY
MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC
NO.120/2008 DTD 22.12.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.
DN) RAMDURG AND LAC APPEAL NO.178/2019 DTD 10.08.2022
PASSED BY THE XI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE,
BELAGAVI IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND THIS APPEAL BE
ALLOWED WITH COSTS.
IN MSA NO.100135/2022
BETWEEN:
SHRI. HASANASAB S/O. SAIDASAB KUDAWAN,
AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: SUNNAL, TAL: RAMDURG - 591123
BELAGAVI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. G.N. NARASAMMANAVAR AND
SRI. P. V. SAMBARGI, ADVOCATES)
-5-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
AND:
1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER,
BAILHONGAL, AT: BAILHONGAL,
TQ: BAILHONGAL - 591102
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BELAGAVI, AT BELAGAVI,
TQ AND DIST: BELAGAVI - 590001.
3. THE TAHASILDAR RAMDURG
RAMDURG, AT: RAMDURG - 591123.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS MSA IS FILED U/S 54(2) IF LAND ACQUISITION ACT
1894, PRAYING TO ENHANCED THE MARKET VALUE AT THE RATE OF
RS.3,66,000/- PER ACRE WITH ALL STATUTORY BENEFITS BY
MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD PASSED IN LAC
NO.119/2008 DTD 22.12.2009 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR DN)
RAMDURG AND LAC APPEAL NO.177/2019 DTD 10.08.22 PASSED BY
THE XITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI
IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND THIS APPEAL BE ALLOWED WITH
COSTS.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
-6-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
MSA No. 100129 of 2022
C/W MSA No. 100116 of 2022
MSA No. 100128 of 2022
MSA No. 100135 of 2022
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR)
These appeals are filed by appellants -claimant
under Section 54 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
(hereinafter referred as to 'L.A. Act' for brevity) for
enhancement of the market value at the rate of
Rs.3,66,000/- per acre with all statutory benefits by
modifying the judgment and award passed by the
Reference Court and also by the Appellate Court.
2. Appellants are owners of the agricultural land
situated at Sunnal village of Ramdurga Taluk.
Respondents have acquired the land of appellants for the
purpose of rehabilitation of Sunnal village. Respondents
have published preliminary notification under Section 4(1)
of the L.A. Act on 18.01.2007 and awarded an amount of
Rs.62,000/- per acre on 17.07.2008. Being aggrieved by
award passed, appellants have filed reference application
under Section 18 of the L.A. Act and same referred to the
Civil Court (for short 'reference court'). The Reference
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
Court fixed the market value of acquired land in a sum of
Rs.2,60,000/- per acre. Appellants having not satisfied
with award amount approached the Appellate Court. The
Appellate Court has enhanced the market value and fixed
the market value at Rs.3,00,000/- per acre. Appellants -
claimants not satisfied with the market value fixed by the
Appellate Court are before this Court.
3. Heard learned counsel for appellants -claimants
and learned High Court Government Pleader for
respondents.
4. Learned counsel for appellants -claimants
would contend that the Reference Court in para No.16 of
the judgment considered the yield per acre referring the
yield certificate -Ex.P17 has calculated the market value in
sum of Rs.3,66,000/- but by referring the judgment and
award passed in LAC No.44/2008 and connected cases has
fixed the market value at Rs.2,60,000/- per acre. There
was no reasons for the Reference Court to fix the market
value for acquired land in a sum Rs.2,60,000/-instead of
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
Rs.3,66,000/- per acre. He contends that the Appellate
Court even taken into consideration of the yield certificate
-Ex.P17 but has not calculated the market value based on
that yield certificate and simply came to the conclusion
that market value is Rs.3,00,000/- per acre. Based on
reasons stated in para No.16 of the judgment of the
Reference Court, appellants are entitled for compensation
of Rs.3,66,000/- per acre for the acquired land. With this,
he prayed to allow appeals.
5. Learned High Court Government Pleader would
contend that the Reference Court considering the
judgment and award passed in LAC No.44/2008 and
connected cases has rightly calculated the market value
for acquired land at Rs.2,60,000/- per acre. The Appellate
Court even though has fixed the market value at
Rs.3,00,000/- per acre but has not assigned sufficient
reasons stating that appellants have not produced latest
yield certificate and land under cultivation was irrigated
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
land. On these grounds, she prays for dismissal of
appeals.
6. Having heard learned counsels, this Court has
perused the impugned judgments and materials placed on
record.
7. The Reference Court in para No.16 of the
judgment passed in LAC No.117/2008 has calculated the
market value for acquired land as per capitalization
method which reads thus:
16. In the yield certificate issued by the Agriculture officer Ex-p 17 it is mentioned that 40 ton of sugarcane will be grown per acre of land. It appears to be on the higher side. The average yield per acre is taken as 30 ton. In the recovery certificate it is mentioned that 110 kg of joggery will be prepared from one ton ofsugarcane. It is taken that 100 kg joggery will be prepared from one ton of sugarcane.
The price of the joggery for the relevant year 2006 & 2007 is Rs.2440-00 per quintal. If the amount fo Rs.2440-00 is multiplied by 30 it will be Rs.73,200-00. Out of this 50% of the amount is to be deducted in respect of cost of cultivation. Remaining amount will be Rs.36,600/- if this amount is multiplied by 10 it will be Rs. 3,66,000/- . It will be the market value of the acquired lands per acre as per capitalization method in view of the decision of
- 10 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in AIR 1984 S.C. 774 Special Land Acquisition Officer Davangere vs P. Veerabhadrappa and others.
8. Even though the Reference Court has came to
the conclusion as per capitalization method, the market
value for the acquired land will be Rs.3,66,000/- per acre
instead of giving that benefit to the claimants has
considered the market value fixed in LAC No.44/2008 and
connected matters. What is basis of market value fixed in
LAC No.44/2008 and connected matters are not
enumerated by the Reference Court. Only on the ground
that lands acquired are situated near the Sunnal village
has relied on the said judgment and award passed in LAC
No.44/2008. The Reference Court ought to have adopted
the capitalization method which it has considered in para
No.16 of the judgment which is beneficial to claimants.
Therefore, the Reference Court and the Appellate Court
have erred in fixing the market value of the acquired lands
at Rs.2,60,000/- and Rs.3,00,000/- per acre respectively.
Considering the above aspects, the market value of the
- 11 -
NC: 2024:KHC-D:10814
acquired land is fixed at Rs.3,66,000/- per acre as per
capitalization method in view of the decision of the Hon'ble
Apex Court in the case of Special Land Acquisition
Officer, Davanagere Vs P. Veerbhadrappa and
Others1 .
9. In view of the above, the following
ORDER
i) Appeals are allowed in part with cost.
ii) Judgment and award passed in LAC No.117/2008
dated 22.12.2009 and LAC Appeal No.175/2019
dated 10.08.2022 are modified and market value of
the acquired land fixed at Rs.3,66,000/- per acre
with all statutory benefits.
iii) Registry is directed to draw decree accordingly.
Sd/-
(SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE
DSP
AIR 1984 SC 774
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!