Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R Rahamathullah vs State By
2024 Latest Caselaw 18936 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18936 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

R Rahamathullah vs State By on 30 July, 2024

Author: M.Nagaprasanna

Bench: M.Nagaprasanna

                                                -1-
                                                           NC: 2024:KHC:30024
                                                       CRL.P No. 6589 of 2024




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                               DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                              BEFORE
                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
                                CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6589 OF 2024


                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    R.RAHAMATHULLAH
                            MALE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
                            S/O RIZVANULLA,
                            R/O 28, ANADHAPURAM, VARAGANERI,
                            TIRUCHIRAPALLI, TAMIL NADU - 620 008
                            (NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN AS PER AADAHR )

                      2.    JAMAL MOHAMED USMAIN @
                            JAMAL MOHAMED S.,
                            AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
                            S/O SAHAUL HAMEED
                            R/AT 16-A
                            160 PALLI VASAL THERU
Digitally signed by
NAGAVENI                    NORTH STREET, PATHAMADAI,
Location: HIGH              TIRUNELVEL
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                   TAMIL NADU - 627 453
                            ( NAME AND ADDRESS SHOWN AS PER AADHAR)
                                                               ...PETITIONERS
                      (BY SRI. A. VELAN, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      STATE BY
                      REPRESENTED BY SPP
                      HIGH COURT BUILDING,
                                   -2-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:30024
                                            CRL.P No. 6589 of 2024




BENGALURU - 560 002.
                                                     ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI B.A.BELLIAPPA, SPP -1 A/W
    SRI THEJESH P., HCGP)


     THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO 1) SET ASIDE THE FINAL JUDGMENT
AND ORDER DATED 03.07.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF
THE XLIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN
SPL.C.NO.794 OF 2023 FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 506(1), 505(1)(b),
505(1)(c), 505(1)(b), 153A, 109, 504, 505(2) OF IPC AND 13
AND 15, 16 AND 18 OF UPAPA, REGISTERED AT VIDHANA
SOUDHA P.S., AND ETC.,

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:       HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA


                           ORAL ORDER

The petitioners - accused No.1 and 2 are before this

Court calling in question an order dated 03.07.2023, passed by

the XLIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, in

Spl.C.No.794/2023, which is registered for the offences under

Sections 506(1), 505(1)(b), 505(1)(c), 505(1)(b), 153A, 109,

504, 505(2) of the IPC and Sections 13, 15, 16 and 18 of the

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

NC: 2024:KHC:30024

2. Heard Sri A. Velan, learned counsel for petitioners and

Sri B.A.Belliappa, learned State Public Prosecutor - 1 along

with Sri Thejesh P., learned High Court Government Pleader for

the respondent.

3. What has driven the petitioners to this Court in the

subject petition is required to be narrated, without going into

the backdrop of what has driven the petitioners into the web of

proceedings. The petitioners file an application under Section

207 of the Cr.P.C., seeking translated copies of the charge

sheet so filed, which is in vernacular language, the vernacular

in the case at hand is Kannada. The petitioners do not

understand the language nor read and write Kannada language.

4. The matter was then moved on the score that the Apex

Court in the case of CBI Vs. NAROTTAM DHAKAD AND

ANOTHER reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1069, wherein

the Apex Court had directed that if the accused facing trial or

the counsel who is defending that accused would not know the

language in which the charge sheet is filed, then the translation

NC: 2024:KHC:30024

must be permitted. Placing reliance upon the said judgment,

this Court granted an interim order of stay on 09.07.2024.

5. Sri S. Velan, learned counsel for petitioners submits

that he himself is not conversant with reading and writing

Kannada language. He can only speak the language. He has

also filed an affidavit to that effect.

6. Learned State Public Prosecutor - 1 would submit that

they would supply the translated copies as required under

Section 207 of the Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court.

7. In that light, a deeper delving into the matter with

regard to whether the fair trial under Article 21 of the

Constitution of India would be met or otherwise, need not be or

is not gone into as one of situation is projected before the

Court and the learned State Public Prosecutor - 1 has given

one of solution.

NC: 2024:KHC:30024

8. In the light of the aforesaid, the following:

ORDER

a. The criminal petition stands disposed.

b. The respondent - State is directed to provide the translated copies of the charge sheet and the material appended to the charge sheet which is in the vernacular, in English language, to the learned counsel for petitioners.

Ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE

NVJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter