Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Hanmantha And Anr vs Sri Thukkaram And Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 18857 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18857 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri Hanmantha And Anr vs Sri Thukkaram And Ors on 29 July, 2024

Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda

                                              -1-
                                                         NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434
                                                    MFA No. 200574 of 2019




                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

                                     KALABURAGI BENCH

                           DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                           BEFORE

                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA

                        MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200574 OF 2019 (MV-D)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.   SRI HANMANTA S/O DYAVAPPA
                        AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
                        OCC: NIL.

                   2.   SMT. VENKAMMA W/O HANMANTA
                        AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
                         OCC: HOUSEHOLD.

                        BOTH R/O MANDEWALA VILLAGE,
                        TQ: JEWARGI, DIST: KALABURAGI.


                                                               ...APPELLANTS
Digitally signed
                   (BY SRI ARUN CHOUDAPURKAR, ADVOCATE)
by RENUKA
Location: HIGH     AND:
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
                   1.   SRI THUKKARAM S/O COKANATHAN,
                        AGE: MAJOR, OCC: OWNER OF TRACTOR
                        NO.TN-20/B-6548,
                        R/O. NO. 24/3, REDDIAR STREET,
                        KONGAMADAM, PALUR,
                        CHENGALPATTU TK,
                        KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT,
                        TAMILNADU STATE-631561.
                            -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434
                                  MFA No. 200574 of 2019




2.   SRI DHATCHANAMOORTHY S/O ADHI-MOOLAM
     AGE: MAJOR, OCC: DRIVER OF
     TRACTOR NO. TN-20/B-6548,
     R/O. NO.123-A/8,
     BAVANIAMMAL KOIL STREET,
     PALUR, CHENGALPATTU TK,
     KANCHIPURAM DISTRICT,
     TAMILNADU STATE-631561.

3.   THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
     THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER,
     OPPOSITE MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA,
     KALABURAGI-585102.


                                         ...RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE TO R2 AND R3 IS DISPENSED WITH
R1-SERVED)


      THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT, PRAYING TO

TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.12.2018

PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AND MACT,

JEWARGI IN MVC NO.38/2018 AND ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY

ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AND ECT.


      THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:


CORAM:   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
                                  -3-
                                             NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434
                                         MFA No. 200574 of 2019




                        ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA)

1. In respect of an accident which is not in dispute,

which resulted in the death of Smt.Padma, a 22 year old,

the Tribunal has awarded the following sums:

Compensation Sl. As awarded by No. Nature of Heads the Tribunal (In Rs.)

1. Loss of Dependency 5,94,000/-

2. Loss of estate 15,000/-

3. Loss of love and affection 40,000/-

4. Funeral expenses 15,000/-

Total 6,64,000/-

2. The present appeal is filed seeking enhancement of

compensation.

3. It is not in dispute that as a result of the motor

vehicle accident which occurred on 11.12.2015,

Smt.Padma, a 22 year old died.

NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434

4. It is not in dispute that the Driver and Owner are

liable to pay the compensation as the offending vehicle

was insured.

5. The Tribunal, on assessment of the evidence adduced

before it, has come to the conclusion that the driver and

owner of the offending vehicle were responsible for the

accident which has resulted in the death of Smt.Padma.

6. In order to arrive at the loss of dependency, the

Tribunal has determined the monthly income of the

deceased notionally at Rs.5,500/-.

7. In cases where there is no evidence to determine the

actual income, it is appropriate to adopt the notional

income as assessed by the Karnataka State Legal Services

Authority, which for the year 2015 would be Rs.8,000/-.

8. As per the decision of the Apex Court in the case of

National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay

Sethi and Others - (2017) 16 SCC 680, as the

deceased was aged about 22 years, 40 % of the same

(Rs.3,200/-.) is required to be added to the said income as

NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434

future prospects and the resultant income would thus be

Rs.11,200/-.

9. Out of the said sum, 1/3rd depending on the number

of dependents, which in this case is i.e., a sum of

Rs.3,733/- would have to be deducted towards personal

expenses of the deceased. The net income will thus be

Rs.7,467/-.

10. As the deceased was aged 22 years, a multiplier of

'18' will have to be applied. Consequently, the claimants

would be entitled to a sum of Rs.16,12,872/- (Rs.7,467/-

x 12 x '18') towards "loss of dependency".

11. The claimants being the parents would each be

entitled to a sum of Rs.44,000/- towards "loss of

consortium" i.e., Rs. 88,000/- and they would also be

entitled to a sum of Rs.33,000/- under the "conventional

heads".

12. Thus, the claimants, in modification of the impugned

award, would be entitled to the following sums :

NC: 2024:KHC-K:5434

Sl. Amount Heads of Compensation No. (in Rs.)

1. Loss of Dependency 16,12,872/-

2. Loss of Consortium 88,000/-

3. Conventional Head 33,000/-

                           Total                  17,33,872/-


13.     Thus,       the   claimants      would   be     entitled    for

compensation of Rs.17,33,872/- as against Rs.6,64,000/-

awarded by the Tribunal, along with interest at the rate of

six per cent per annum from the date of petition till its

realization.

14. The owner and driver are directed to deposit the

amount of compensation awarded along with interest

within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a

certified copy of this judgment.

The appeal is accordingly allowed in part.

Sd/-

(N.S.SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE

MSR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter