Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Salman Khan @ Salma vs State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 18803 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 18803 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Salman Khan @ Salma vs State Of Karnataka on 26 July, 2024

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                               -1-
                                                             NC: 2024:KHC:29654
                                                           WP No. 12812 of 2024



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                            BEFORE

                          THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

                          WRIT PETITION NO. 12812 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)

                   BETWEEN:

                   SALMAN KHAN @ SALMA
                   S/O. LATE NOOR AHAMED,
                   AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
                   R/AT 3RD CROSS, A.P. MOHALLA,
                   NEAR FATHIMA MASJID,
                   CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN,
                   CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT,
                   PIN CODE NO. 571 313.

                   NOW AT OPPOSITE TO OLD KSRTC BUS STAND,
                   BELLARI-583 101.
                                                                   ...PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI. SOMASHEKAR KASHIMATH.,ADVOCATE)

                   AND:
Digitally signed   1.   STATE OF KARNATAKA
by                      REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
LEELAVATHI S            DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS,
R
                        GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                VIDHANA SOUDHA,
KARNATAKA               BENGALURU-560 001.

                   2.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
                        CUM-SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,
                        KOLLEGAL, KOLLEGAL SUB DIVISION,
                        CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT,
                        PIN CODE-571 440.

                   3.   THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
                        CHAMARAJANAGARA,
                        CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT,
                        PIN CODE NO-571 313.
                                   -2-
                                                 NC: 2024:KHC:29654
                                               WP No. 12812 of 2024



4.   THE POLICE INSPECTOR
     CHAMARAJANAGARA TOWN POLICE,
     CHAMARAJANAGARA,
     PIN CODE NO. 571 313.
                                                    ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S T NAIK.,AGA FOR R1 TO R4)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
ENTIRE RECORDS AND PROCEEDINGS OF THIS CASE AND
HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO ISSUE AND QUASH THE ORDER
DTD 12.04.2024 PASSED BY THE R-2 A.C./SUB-DIVISIONAL
MAGISTRATE,     KOLLEGAL       SUB-DIVISION,    KOLLEGAL,
CHAMARANAGARA DISTRICT, IN MAG(GA)CR./16/2024 AS PER
ANNEXURE-H

     THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:

CORAM:     HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

                           ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the

impugned externment order at Annexure-H dated 12.04.2024,

passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 55 of the Karnataka

Police Act, 1963 (for short "the K.P. Act").

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

AGA for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged

in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on

record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

NC: 2024:KHC:29654

impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent directing externment

of the petitioner is not only contrary to the provisions and procedure

prescribed / contained in Sections 55 to 58 of the K.P.Act, but also

against the principles governing externment as enunciated by the

Apex Court in the case of Deepak vs. State of Maharashtra -

2022 SCC OnLine SC 99 which has been followed by this Court in

the case of Giddappa Vs. Lambu Giddappa Vs. State of

Karnataka and others - W.P.No.8182/2023 dated 21.04.2023 and

in the case of Shakeeb @ Mohammed Shakeebullah vs. State of

Karnataka & others - W.P.No.14426/2023 dated 28.11.2023. It is

therefore submitted that the impugned order passed by the

respondents deserves to be quashed.

4. Per contra, learned AGA for the respondents would

support the impugned order and submits that there is no merit in

the petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

5. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the

petitioner, a perusal of the material on record including the

impugned order will clearly indicate that the 2nd respondent has

failed to follow the mandatory requirements and procedure

prescribed under Sections 55 to 58 of the Karnataka Police Act,

NC: 2024:KHC:29654

while passing the impugned order which is clearly contrary to the

principles enunciated by the Apex Court and this Court in the

judgments referred to supra. Under these circumstances, I am of

the view that the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent at

Annexure-H dated 12.04.2024 deserves to be quashed.

6. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Petition is hereby allowed.

(ii) The impugned order dated 12.04.2024 at Annexure-H

passed by the 2nd respondent is hereby quashed.

Sd/-

(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

BMC

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter