Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Nitin S/O Rajaram Kudale vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 15865 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15865 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Nitin S/O Rajaram Kudale vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 July, 2024

                                                          -1-
                                                                   NC: 2024:KHC-D:9159
                                                                     WP No. 103733 of 2024




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
                                        DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
                                                       BEFORE
                                  THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
                                     WRIT PETITION NO. 103733 OF 2024 (GM-PDS)
                             BETWEEN:
                             NITIN S/O. RAJARAM KUDALE,
                             AGE: 44 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
                             R/O. GANEHSHPUR, BELAGAVI,
                             DIST: BELAGAVI-591108.
                                                                               ...PETITIONER
                             (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE)
                             AND:
                             1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                                  BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
                                  FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPT.,
                                  VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-01.

                             2.   THE COMMISSIONER,
                                  FOOD, CIVIL AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPT.,
                                  CUNNINGHAM ROAD, VASANTH NAGAR,
                                  BENGLAURU-02.

                             3.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
ASHPAK
                                  BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590011.
KASHIMSA
MALAGALADINNI


Digitally signed by ASHPAK
                             4.   THE JOINT DIRECTOR,
KASHIMSA
MALAGALADINNI
Location: HIGH COURT OF
KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
                                  FOOD, CIVIL AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPT.,
BENCH
Date: 2024.07.10 11:58:30
+0530
                                  BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590011.
                                                                             ...RESPONDENTS
                             (BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, HCGP)
                                  THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
                             OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE
                             NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT
                             DATED   25.06.2024   ISSUED    BY   RESPONDENT    NO.4   IN
                             NO.AAPUVI/NIYABEAM/VINIDHI-28/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-C; A
                             WRIT IN A NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT
                             NO.4 TO TRANSFER THE LICENSE IN FAVOR OF PETITIONER AS
                             HELD BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.100048/2024 VIDE
                             ANNEXURE-D AND ETC.
                                 -2-
                                        NC: 2024:KHC-D:9159
                                            WP No. 103733 of 2024




      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                              ORDER

1. Learned HCGP accepts notice for the respondents.

2. The petitioner is assailing the impugned endorsement

dated 25.06.2024 issued by respondent No.4 vide

Annexure-C. The petitioner's mother was the original

licence holder of a fair price shop. On account of death of

her mother, the petitioner submitted an application

seeking transfer of licence. Respondent No.4 has issued

impugned endorsement declining the transfer of fair price

shop licence on the premise that the original licence holder

was aged above 65 years and petitioner has not completed

SSLC.

3. The issue relating to transfer of licence of fair price shop is

dealt by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in identical cases.

The Co-ordinate Bench in identical cases, passed an order

holding that the defence in regard to age of earlier

licencee cannot be a ground to reject the application

seeking transfer of licence on compassionate ground. This

Court in catena of judgments has also held that the

NC: 2024:KHC-D:9159

transferee even if he/she has not passed SSLC, will not in

itself constitute a bar to seek transfer of licence on

compassionate ground. In the light of the judgments

rendered by this Court, the impugned endorsement is not

sustainable and is liable to be quashed. For the foregoing

reasons, this Court passes the following:

ORDER

i) The writ petition is allowed.

ii) The impugned endorsement dated 25.06.2024 issued by respondent No.4 vide Annexure-C is hereby quashed.

iii) A mandamus is issued against respondent No.4 to consider the representation of the petitioner seeking transfer of licence in favour of petitioner by taking cognizance of the judgment passed in W.P.No.100048/ 2023.

Sd/-

JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter