Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. P Venugopal @ P Mani vs The State Of Karnataka
2024 Latest Caselaw 15862 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15862 Kant
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

Sri. P Venugopal @ P Mani vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 July, 2024

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                           -1-
                                                        NC: 2024:KHC:25162
                                                      WP No. 17609 of 2024




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                          DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                         BEFORE
                       THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                      WRIT PETITION NO. 17609 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
                BETWEEN:

                      SRI. P. VENUGOPAL @ P. MANI,
                      S/O K. PERUMAL,
                      AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
                      RESIDING AT 'VENKATESHWARA NILAYA',
                      NEAR IOB BANK, BELAGUMBA - 572 104,
                      TUMKUR, DISTRICT TUMKUR.
                                                              ...PETITIONER
                (BY SRI. SAGAR B.B, ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY,
                      DEPARTMENT OF HOME,
Digitally             VIDHANA SOUDHA,
signed by
YAMUNA K L            BENGALURU - 560 001.
Location:
High Court of   2.    THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND
Karnataka
                      INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
                      KARNATAKA STATE,
                      BENGALURU - 560 001.

                3.    THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
                      TUMKUR DISTRICT,
                      TUMKUR - 572 103.
                            -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC:25162
                                    WP No. 17609 of 2024




4.   THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
     KYATHASANDRA, TUMKUR TALUK,
     TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 104.

5.   THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
     KYATHASANDRA POLICE STATION,
     TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 104.

6.   THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
     TUMKUR TALUK,
     TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 103.

7.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
     TUMKUR DISTRICT,
     TUMKUR - 572 103.

8.   THE ASST. COMMISSIONER,
     TUMKUR SUB-DIVISION,
     TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572 103.

9.   THE TAHASILDAR,
     TUMKUR TALUK,
     TUMKUR - 572 103.
                                          ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA, AGA)

    THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION FOR POLICE
PROTECTION VIDE ANNX-C FOR EXTENDING POLICE
PROTECTION IN RESPECT OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO. 137
MEASURING    3   ACRES    32  GUNTAS    SITUATED  AT
THIMMANAYAKANAHALLI     VILLAGE,  URUDUGERE    HOBLI,
TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT AND ETC.,

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                                -3-
                                              NC: 2024:KHC:25162
                                          WP No. 17609 of 2024




                              ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner is seeking for the following

reliefs:

"a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the application for police protection vide Annexure-C, for extending police protection in respect of the land bearing Sy.No.137, measuring 3 Acres 32 Guntas situated at Thimmanayakanahalli Village, Urudugere Hobli, Tumkur Taluk, Tumkur District, in the interest of justice and equity.

b) Pass any other order or directions deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, including Awarding of costs, in the interest of justice and equity.."

2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and

learned AGA for the respondents and perused the material on

record.

3. It is the grievance of the petitioner that his

representation dated 15.05.2024, at Annexure-C submitted to

the respondents has not been considered so far by them nor

any order has been passed on the same. Under these

circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the

present petition.

NC: 2024:KHC:25162

4. Per contra, learned AGA for the respondents

submits that if reasonable time is given, they would consider

and pass necessary order on the said representation.

5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances

and rival submissions, the respondents are hereby directed to

address the grievance of the petitioner and consider his

representation dated 15.05.2024, at Annexure-C and pass

appropriate order in accordance with law, bearing in mind the

judgments of this Court in the case of RANGANATHAN STONE

CRUSHERS AND ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA in

WP.No.10049/2022 and GANAPATHY GRANITE Vs.

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND OTHERS in

WP.No.11719/2022 and within a period of four weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order,

6. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands

disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter