Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15669 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:25754
RSA No. 443 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 443 OF 2013 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
SRI. SUKASAPPA,
S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS,
R/AT KOLATURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURUAL DISTRICT - 562 114.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H. V. MANJUNATH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SRI. NARAYANAPPA,
Digitally signed S/O LATE MEENAJAPPA,
by AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
NARAYANAPPA
LAKSHMAMMA
Location: HIGH 2. SRI. VENKATASHAMAPPA,
COURT OF S/O LATE MEENAJAPPA,
KARNATAKA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT
KOLATHURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114.
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:25754
RSA No. 443 of 2013
3. SRI. BYRAPPA,
S/O LATE VENKATASWAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS,
4. SRI. K. H. ANJANAPPA,
S/O LATE CHIKKAHANUMANTHARAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESPONDENT NOS.3 AND 4 ARE
R/AT KOLATHURU VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 114.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.MADHUVACHAR & K.B.MAHADEVAIAH.,ADVOCATE
FOR R2,
R1 AND 4 SERVED AND UNRERPESENTED. VIDE ORDER DATED
24.01.2024 SERVICE TO R3 HELD SUFFICIENT. )
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS FROM
THE COURT BELOW AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN R.A.NO.132/2008 DATED
28.01.2013 PASED BY THE HON'BLE SESSIONS JUDGE FAST
TRACT COURT - II, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE
AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN O.S.NO.149/2002 DATED
16.10.2008 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DVN)
AT HOSKOTE AND ALLOW THE APPEAL AS PRAYED FOR IN THE
PLIANT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:25754
RSA No. 443 of 2013
JUDGMENT
1. The sole appellant has expired about six months
back. The learned counsel for the appellant submits
that despite of his best efforts, he has not been able
to contact the legal representatives or secure
instructions. In that view of the matter, no purpose
would be served by continuing with the matter and
as such the above appeal is dismissed as abated.
2. In the event of the legal representatives approaching
this Court by filing necessary application, the same
would be considered on merits.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RMS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!