Monday, 01, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Divisional Controller vs Parshuram
2024 Latest Caselaw 15353 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 15353 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Divisional Controller vs Parshuram on 2 July, 2024

                                                -1-
                                                  NC: 2024:KHC-K:4495-DB
                                                        WA No. 200072 of 2020




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                                        KALABURAGI BENCH

                               DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2024

                                             PRESENT

                             THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
                                               AND
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

                             WRIT APPEAL NO. 200072 OF 2020 (L-KSRTC)

                      BETWEEN:

                      THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER,NEKRTC,
                      RAICHUR DIVISION,RAICHUR,
                      THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,NEKRTC,
                      SARIGE SADAN,MAIN ROAD, GULBARGA,
                      REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF LAW OFFICER-585 102.

                                                               ...APPELLANT
                      (BY MISS. SANGEETA BHADRASHETTY, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      PARSHURAM S/O KELLUDAPPA,
Digitally signed by
BASALINGAPPA          AGE:44 YEARS, OCC:NIL,
SHIVARAJ              (EX-DRIVER NO.4598 OF SINDHANUR DEPOT)
DHUTTARGAON
Location: HIGH        R/O SIROOR, TQ. & DIST.BAGALKOT -587 101.
COURT OF
KARNATAKA                                                         ...RESPONDENT

                           THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S. 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
                      HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
                      10.10.2019 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN
                      W.P.NO.83820/2012, FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE
                      WRIT PETITION AS PRAYED FOR THEREIN, IN THE INTEREST
                      OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

                          THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY
                      ASHOK S. KINAGI J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                  -2-
                                   NC: 2024:KHC-K:4495-DB
                                            WA No. 200072 of 2020




                             JUDGMENT

This writ appeal is filed challenging the order dated

10.10.2019 passed in W.P.No.83820/2012 by the learned

Single Judge. The writ petition filed by the petitioner is

held to be under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,

and Co-ordinate bench of this Court in the case of

Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd., Bangalore

Vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Karmika Sangha Bangalore,

reported in AIR Online 2022 KAR 4396, held that the

intra Court appeal is not maintainable against the order

passed by the learned Single Judge being a challenge to

the judicial order of the Labour Court. The co-ordinate

Bench of this Court referring the order passed in

Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. (supra) in

W.A.No.100230/2023, disposed of on 12.04.2023, held

that the intra Court appeal is not maintainable. The

appellant, in the said writ appeal aggrieved by the order

dated 12.04.2023, preferred Special Leave Petition before

the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (Civil) Diary

Nos.32290/2023. The Hon'ble Apex Court vide order

NC: 2024:KHC-K:4495-DB

dated 15.03.2024 dismissed the Special Leave Petition and

observed as under:

"We see no infirmity with the view taken by the Division Bench of the High Court in the impugned orders. The special leave petitions are accordingly dismissed."

2. In view of the law laid down in the case of

Management of Bharat Fritz Werner Ltd. Bangalore,

the intra Court appeal filed by the appellant is not

maintainable. Accordingly, writ appeal is dismissed as not

maintainable.

3. In view of the disposal of appeal, IA.Nos.1/2021

and 2/2021 do not survive for consideration. Accordingly,

same stand disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

MSR

CT;BN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter