Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 992 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
COMAP No. 21 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 21 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SMT AISHWARYA AGARWAL
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
W/O MR SHANKARLAL AGARWAL
2. SRI SHANKARA LAL AGARWAL
W/O LATE BILAS RAI AGARWAL,
AGED BOUT 70 YEARS.
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
FLAT NO.D-103,
ADARSHA PALACE
47TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK
JAYANAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 041
Digitally signed by D
HEMA
Location: HIGH COURT
...APPELLANTS
OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI VIJAYA KUMAR K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. M/S KEERTHI PROPERTIES
NO 118/2 KEERTHI PRIDE
DODDA THOGURU (D)
BEGURU (H)
BENGALURU - 560 100
REPRESEMTED BY ITS PARTNER
2. SRI K V ANJANEYA REDDY
S/O LATE V VENKATAREDDY
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
COMAP No. 21 of 2023
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT NO 13/1 1ST CROSS
MUNISHWARA BLOCK
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM
BENGALURU - 560 086.
3. SRI G B BABU REDDY
S/O BYRAREDDY G V
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
R/AT NO 46/2 3RD CROSS
BYATARAYANAPURA
BENGALURU - 560 092.
4. SRI P SIVANGANGDHAR
S/O P GANDARAO
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/AT NO 28, 12TH CROSS
PAMPA EXTN
KEMPAPURA, HEBBALA
BENGALURU - 560 027
5. SRI K VAMSIDHAR REDDY
S/O LATE K RAMACHANDRA REDDY
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
R/AT NO.48, FLAT NO.203
2ND FLOOR
SIVASAL RESIDENCY
LAKE CITY TOWN SHIP
5TH CROSS T C PALYA
K R PURAM
BENGALURU 560036
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI NAVEEN KUMAR N.S., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI VISWANATHA SETTY V., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
13(1-A) OF THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2016, PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
02.07.2022, PASSED IN COM.O.S.NO.613/2021, BY THE
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
COMAP No. 21 of 2023
LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (EXCLUSIVE
COMMERICIAL COURTS AT BENGALURU CITY, (CCH-88) AND
DISMISS THE SUIT OF PLAINTIFF AND TO CALL FOR RECORDS
IN COM.O.S.NO.613/2021 ON THE FILE OF LXXXVII ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY (CCH-
88).
THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, K.SOMASHEKAR J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the defendant Nos.1 and 2
challenging the order dated 02.07.2022 passed in
Commercial Original Suit No.613 of 2021 by the LXXXVII
Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru and have
sought to dismiss the suit of the plaintiff by allowing this
appeal, by urging various grounds.
2. The appellants submits that the respondents
herein who are the plaintiffs before the Trial Court filed the
suit in Com.O.S.No.613 of 2021 against them for recovery of
a sum of Rs.89,96,000/- along with future interest at the
rate of 24% per annum from the date of suit till the date of
payment. The Trial Court partly decreed the suit of the
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
plaintiffs with costs, directing the appellants/ defendants to
pay jointly and severally to the plaintiffs a sum of
Rs.50,00,000/- with interest at 18% per annum, from the
date of the payment, till realization and further were directed
to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Aggrieved by the said order, the defendants have filed
the present appeal. After filing of this appeal, on
30.01.2023, this Court was pleased to stay the judgment
and decree passed in Com.O.S.No.613 of 2021, subject to
deposit of Rs.30,00,000/- before this Court and in
compliance of the order dated 30.01.2023, the appellants
have deposited a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- before this Court by
way of Demand Draft bearing No.020209, drawn on HSBC
Bank, Bengaluru.
3. The learned counsel on both sides as well as the
parties to the proceedings are present before the Court
physically and submits that they have filed compromise
petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 and submits that they have amicably settled
the subject matter of the suit at the intervention of the well-
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
wishers and friends and accordingly, the parties have agreed
to settle the dispute in the following terms:
"4. The Respondents have agreed to receive a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty lakhs Only) from the appellants as full and final settlement amount in the following manner:
(a) Rs.6,50,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) by way of demand draft bearing No.022090, dated 08.01.2024, drawn on State Bank of India, J.P.Nagar, Branch, Bengaluru, in favour of Respondent No.2, K.V.ANJANEYA REDDY receipt of which the Respondent No.2 hereby acknowledges the same.
(b) Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) by way of demand draft bearing No.022091, dated 08.01.2024, drawn on State Bank of India, J.P. Nagar, Branch, Bengaluru, in favour of Respondent No.3, G.B. BABU REDDY receipt of which the Respondent No.3 hereby acknowledges the same.
(c) Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) by way of demand draft bearing No.022092, dated 08.01.2024, drawn on State Bank of India, J.P.Nagar, Branch, Bengaluru, In
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
favour of Respondent No.4, P.SHIVAGANGADHAR receipt of which the Respondent No.4 hereby acknowledges the same.
(d) Rs.3,50,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Fifty Thousand Only) by way of demand draft bearing No.022093, dated 08.01.2024, drawn on State Bank of India, J.P. Nagar, Branch, Bengaluru, in favour of Respondent No.5, K.Vamsidhar Reddy, receipt of which the Respondent No.5 hereby acknowledges the same.
(e) The appellants have deposited a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- before this Hon'ble Court on 21.02.2023 by way of demand draft bearing No.020209, drawn on HSBC Bank, Bengaluru the same was realized on 15.03.2023 into the account of the Registrar, High Court of Karnataka and the appellants have no objection to returning the amount of Rs.30,00,000/- in favour of the respondents No.2 to 5 equally i.e., a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- to each of the respondent No.2 to 5.
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
5. The Respondents have agreed to receive the above-mentioned amounts in full and final settlement of the dispute and declare/affirm that there are no further dues pending to them.
6. The Respondents have agreed and assure the appellants that they will not claim any right, title, interest or possession over the suit schedule property based on the memorandum of understanding dated 19.09.2018 entered in respect of the suit schedule property in Com.O.S. No. 613/2021 and the memorandum of understanding dated 19.09.2018 is hereby mutually cancelled between the parties and the Respondents will not enforce the judgment and decree passed in Com.O.S.No.613/2021.
7. The Respondents have assured the appellants that the appellants are at liberty to enjoy the suit schedule property as per their will and wish and the Respondents will not claim any right in the Schedule property. Further, the Respondents will not interfere with the possession of the appellants in respect of the Schedule Property.
8. The Respondents have agreed to withdraw the pending criminal case in C.C.No.15995/2022, pending on the file of the 6th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru, in view of the
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
settlement arrived between the appellants and respondents in respect of the suit claim based on the Memorandum of understanding dated 19.09.2018
9. It is submitted that the Appellants and the Respondents have entered into this compromise out of their own volition, free will and without any undue influence, or coercion from any angle and they have signed this compromise after verifying and understanding the terms of this compromise.
10. In view of the settlement arrived at permissible court fee may kindly be refunded in the name of Appellant No.1 for which appellant No.2 has no objection".
4. Consequent upon settlement of the issues
emerged between the parties, the appeal is hereby disposed
of in terms of the compromise petition. The parties to the
proceedings have subscribe their signatures in the order-
sheet of the compromise petition. Draw decree accordingly.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned
counsel for the appellants, a sum of Rs.30 Lakhs deposited
by the appellants before this Court in pursuance of the order
passed by this Court on 30.01.2023 be transmitted to the
NC: 2024:KHC:1758-DB
account of Respondent Nos.2 to 5 equally, if they furnish
their account details. Accordingly, Registry is directed to
transmit the amount equally.
6. Keeping in view of the submission made by the
learned counsel for the appellants, when the matter is
settled in terms of compromise, it deems appropriate, if any
Court-fee has been paid while preferring this appeal, the
Registry is directed to return the Court-fee, which has been
paid by the appellants, on due identification. However, it is
submitted that the Court-fee, which has been paid by the
appellants in this matter shall be refunded to Appellant No.1
only, namely, Smt.Aishwarya Agarwal, Wife of
Shri.Shankarlal Agarwal, on due identification, in accordance
with law.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
DH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!