Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 942 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:1301-DB
MFA No. 8727 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8727 OF 2022 (ECA)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SARAMMA
W/O AMEDIA BEARE,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
2-16, NALEJALALU HOUSE,
PREBEA, KUNTHAUR,
DHAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT,
PERMANENT ADDRESS MEREAZA MALLA,
4TH CROSS, HASSAN 573 201.
2. HAMEDIA BEARE,
S/O. EBARAHIM,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
Digitally 2-16, NALEJALALU HOUSE,
signed by
SHAKAMBARI PREBEA, KUNTHAUR,
Location:
HIGH COURT
DHAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT,
OF PERMANENT ADDRESS MEREAZA MALLA,
KARNATAKA
4TH CROSS, HASSAN 573 201.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SMT. KAVITHA H C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DINESHA KUMAR NARAYANA
CHALWALE S/O NARAYNA CHALWALE,
MAJOR, PLATA, NO.112,
HEARBI APARTMENT,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:1301-DB
MFA No. 8727 of 2022
AKSHAYA HOTEL NEAR,
DANDWADI, POONA,
MAHARASHTRA STATE 411 001.
(OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.MH-
12-KP-4057)
2. THE MANAGER
H.D.F.C. ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE,
NO.110, H.M. JENEWA HOUSE, KANEGAMA ROAD,
BANGALORE-52.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNA REDDY N.A. FOR
SRI. PRADEEP B., ADVOCATE FOR R2, (VK NOT FILED))
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 30(1)
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
AWARD DATED: 11.04.2019 PASSED IN ECA NO.07/2016 ON
THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, DR.H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Called again in the afternoon.
2. None appear for the appellants either physically or
through Video Conference. Learned counsel for respondent
No.2 alone is physically present.
NC: 2024:KHC:1301-DB
3. A perusal of the order sheet would go to show
that, inspite of granting sufficient opportunity for five
times, the appellant has not complied with the office
objections. Matter is being listed only to comply with office
objections for which, the appellant has not evinced interest
to comply the same inspite of sufficient adjournments and
pass over.
4. No reasons are forthcoming for non-appearance.
Hence, the Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution
as well as for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sk/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!