Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 795 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:498
RPFC No. 100041 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO.100041 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. NAGARATNA W/O. SANTOSH MALAWAD
AGE. 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD,
R/O.C/O. # 32, KEC, NEAR GOKUL ROAD,
DR.RADHAKRISHNA NAGAR,
UDYAM NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580030.
2. ARADYA D/O. SANTOSH MALAWAD
AGE. 9 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
R/O.C/O. # 32, KEC, NEAR GOKUL ROAD,
DR.RADHAKRISHNA NAGAR,
UDYAM NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580030.
3. ARCHANA D/O. SANTOSH MALAWAD
AGE. 5 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT,
Digitally
signed by
R/O.C/O. # 32, KEC, NEAR GOKUL ROAD,
BHARATHI H
BHARATHI M DR.RADHAKRISHNA NAGAR,
HM Date: UDYAM NAGAR, HUBBALLI-580030.
2024.01.11
11:35:14
+0530
SINCE PETITIONER Nos.2 AND 3 ARE
MINOR DAUGHTERS THEY ARE
REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER
PETITIONER NO.1 THE NATURAL GUARDIAN
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. H.N. HANCHINAMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:498
RPFC No. 100041 of 2023
SANTOSH
S/O. SHEKARAPPA MALAWAD,
AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT,
R/O. MASANAKATTE, TQ.HANAGAL
DIST. HAVERI.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT:
C/O. SMT. PARVATHI W/O. VEERAYYA
KABBINAKANTINAMATH, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD,
HAVERI-581110.
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. SACHIN C.KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
THIS R.P.F.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE
FAMILY COURT ACT, PRAYING TO a) KINDLY SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER IN CRI.MISC. NO.
288/2021 DATED 04.01.2023 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL
PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HUBBALLI AND ALLOW THE
PETITION FILED BY MODIFYING AND ENHANCING THE
MAINTENANCE AWARD OF RS. 5000/- PER MONTH TO EACH
DAUGHTER OF THE TWO DAUGHTERS (PETITIONER NO. 2 AND
3) TO RS. 10,000/- EACH AND ALSO BE PLEASED TO AWARD
MAINTENANCE OF RS. 10,000/- PER MONTH TO PETITIONER
NO. 1 TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS R.P.F.C, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC-D:498
RPFC No. 100041 of 2023
ORDER
Shri. H. N. Hanchinamani, learned counsel for the
revision petitioner submits that the matter has been settled
amicably between the parties and he will file necessary memo
after taking instructions.
2. Placing his submission on record, RPFC stands
disposed of as settled out of the Court.
3. However, if the matter is not settled as is
submitted, the revision petitioner is at liberty to revise the
present petition by filing necessary application.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SMM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!