Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Ramya
2024 Latest Caselaw 784 Kant

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 784 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2024

Karnataka High Court

The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Smt Ramya on 9 January, 2024

Author: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry

Bench: H.B.Prabhakara Sastry

                                         -1-
                                                   NC: 2024:KHC:1187-DB
                                                  MFA No. 8270 of 2016




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                      DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
                                      PRESENT

                  THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY

                                         AND

              THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR

                  MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8270 OF 2016 (MV-D)

             BETWEEN:

             THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD
             CBO - 2, NO 1/1, CANNAUGHT ROAD,
             QUEENS ROAD CROSS,
             BANGALORE.
             THROUGH ITS BENGALURU REGIONAL OFFICE
             NO 44/45, LEO SHOPPING COMPLEX,
             RESIDENCY ROAD CROSS,
             BENGALURU - 560 025.
             REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
                                                       ...APPELLANT

             (BY SRI. S V HEGDE MULKHAND., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
SHAKAMBARI
Location:
HIGH COURT
             AND:
OF
KARNATAKA
             1.     SMT. RAMYA
                    W/O LATE BOMMEGOWDA,
                    AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
                    R/O NO 69,
                    1ST CROSS,
                    2ND MAIN ROAD,
                    MANJUNATHANAGAR,
                    ITTAMADU,
                    BSK 2ND STAGE,
                    BENGALURU - 560 085.
                             -2-
                                      NC: 2024:KHC:1187-DB
                                      MFA No. 8270 of 2016




2.   DAKSHITHA
     S/O LATE BOMMEGOWDA
     AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS,
     SINCE MINOR REP. BY HER MOTHER
     AND NATURAL GUARDIAN,
     SMT. RAMYA,
     R/O NO 69, 1ST CROSS,
     2ND MAIN ROAD,
     MANJUNATHANAGAR,
     ITTAMADU,
     BSK 2ND STAGE,
     BENGALURU - 560 085.

3.   BHADRAKALAMMA
     W/O LATE BOMMEGOWDA,
     AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS,
     R/O NO 69, 1ST CROSS,
     2ND MAIN ROAD,
     MANJUNATHANAGAR,
     ITTAMADU,
     BSK 2ND STAGE,
     BENGALURU - 560 085.

4.   THE PROPRIETOR
     M/S INTEGRATED LOGISTICS PVT. LTD,
     NO 122/5A, CHIKKATHAYAPPA LAYOUT,
     CHALEKERE,
     KALYANANAGAR BUS DEPOT,
     NEAR SUSRUTHA NURSING HOME,
     KALYANANAGAR,
     BENGALURU - 560 043.

5.   ANITHA D M
     W/O PUTTASWAMY,
     NO 65/2, 4TH CROSS,
     KAVERIPURA,
     KAMAKSHIPALYA,
     BANGALORE - 560 079.
                             -3-
                                     NC: 2024:KHC:1187-DB
                                     MFA No. 8270 of 2016




6.   RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LIMITED,
     NO 28, 5TH FLOOR,
     CENTUANARY BUILDING,
     M G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001.
     REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. R.G. HALESHA., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
R2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY R1
R3 & R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED
SRI.H.C. BETSUR ADVOCATE FOR R6)

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S
173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD
DATED 20.08.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.1230/2015 ON THE
FILE OF THE MEMBER, PRINCIPAL MACT, BANGALORE,
AWARDING     COMPENSATION  OF  Rs.29,38,073/- WITH
INTEREST @ 9% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL
REALIZATION.

     THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR J.,
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                        JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant appeared through

video conference. He submits that he may be granted

time to take out paper publication against respondent

No.5.

2. The records of this appeal reveals that the

notices were issued to respondent No.5 thrice and as per

NC: 2024:KHC:1187-DB

order the dated 03.08.2022, the notice so issued returned

unserved and needful was not done.

3. Even after granting sufficient time on

03.08.2022, the appellant has not shown any interest in

taking steps against respondent No.5. No acceptable

reasons are assigned for adjournment. Hence, the appeal

against respondent No.5 is dismissed as steps not taken.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

PSJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter